My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1982 11 16
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1982 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1982 11 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:50 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 12:08:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
11/16/1982
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1982 11 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
11/3/82 Page -3- <br /> outline of the history of the leachate problem. <br /> This will be done either through the Louisville <br /> Tunas or sent to the residents. <br /> Councilman Leary Requested this report be placed on the agenda <br /> for the next council meeting thus allowing <br /> people to isk further question* and council <br /> • discussion. <br /> Mayor Meier Advised if councilmembers wished further <br /> information on the leachate problem, it was <br /> available from staff. <br /> CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT Attorney Rautenstraua read the ordinance by <br /> ORDINANCE #767 - VIDEO title only on second reading and public hearing; <br /> GAMES - PUBLIC HEARING also certified proper publication. <br /> Mayor Meier opened the public hearing and <br /> Attorney Bautenstraus advised that notice of <br /> the public hearing was published in the <br /> Louisville Times October 13, 1982. Rautenstraus <br /> also advised that amendments to the ordinance <br /> on first reading had been published. <br /> Mayor Meier asked if there was anyone in favor <br /> of the ordinance. None. <br /> Anyone in opposition to the ordinance. <br /> Mrs. Carol Kelly - Co-owner Stated the fee of $100.00 per machine is <br /> Pinball Wizard excessive and that she had provided copies of <br /> In Opposition her profit and loss statement to councilmembers . <br /> She suggested a fee of $25 .00 per machine as <br /> more feasible. Stated that her husband has <br /> been i11 and in the hospital requiring her to <br /> hire addtional help, which again cut into the <br /> profits. This is their only source of income. <br /> The range or revnue realized from each machine <br /> was from $25.00 - $85.00 per week. The machines <br /> are enjoyed by families , young adults and resi- <br /> dents of the City. It was her opinion that <br /> machines in bars and grocery stores perhaps <br /> did realize revenue of $350.00 per week, per <br /> machine and most of them did not have to pay <br /> rent nor utilities. She commented the $700. 00 <br /> she would be required to pay by ordinance could <br /> be used for remodeling or buying bike racks , etc. <br /> She requested that councilmembers please con- <br /> sider amending the ordinance to reduce the <br /> fees - had no problem with the rest of the <br /> ordinance . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.