My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1982 11 16
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1982 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1982 11 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:50 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 12:08:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
11/16/1982
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1982 11 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> 11/3/82 Page -12- <br /> did feel it was Council' s responsibility if <br /> there is ambiguity to clear up this issue. <br /> It was hope that the Judge would rule on this <br /> issue soon. <br /> Councilman Ferrera Inquired what made the Judge an expert on <br /> our zoning laws. <br /> Counciwoman Morris Commented in response to Councilmen Ferrara <br /> and Fauson, that MCIC has requested a Declar- <br /> atory Judgement; however according to the <br /> Judge's ruling it was a premature request. <br /> As far as a special interest group to her <br /> that term had a real negative connotation. <br /> Felt that Council was responding to a very <br /> specific group of people. In any type of <br /> situation where there is a type building being <br /> constructed and all the surrounding neighbors <br /> are extremely concerned, it is Council' s re- <br /> sponsibility to respond to their concerns . <br /> There is a large group of people on the <br /> Mesa asking Council to clarify that the use <br /> is correct ; they don't feel it is appropriate <br /> for the zoning, and if the Judge says it is <br /> o.k. then they will accept that. She felt <br /> Council owed this to those citizens to give <br /> them that right to respond to those kinds of <br /> needs. She cited the needs of the neighbor- <br /> hood citizens on the Kosher Burrito concerns <br /> which were being addressed as should be done. <br /> She agreed that she did not know what the <br /> Judge would rule, and Judge's do make mistakes <br /> as well; but felt at this point an impartial <br /> evaluation is being sought which no one could <br /> give at this point. <br /> Councilman Ferrera Commented he did not intend for his comments <br /> on a special interest group to be negative. <br /> Felt that the City may have to go to Court <br /> on the Koshier Burrito issue . It may not be <br /> clear as stated in the ordinance; but felt <br /> Council should make that decision. Felt that <br /> people were being represented when a decision <br /> is made by Council. Ferrera further commented <br /> that Council was split on whether the zoning <br /> is proper; but the vote taken reflected <br /> that it was a proper use . It was his feeling <br /> that the Judge would have no more experience <br /> than Director of Community Development Rupp <br /> had. Still felt a Declaratory Judgement could <br /> be requested on various issues, the City paid <br /> for one previously, so would pay for it again. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.