My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1984 10 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1984 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1984 10 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:53 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 1:38:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
10/2/1984
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1984 10 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
411 411 <br /> 9/18184 Page -3- <br /> PRESENTATION - PRC/US 36 Councilmembers had a copy of information <br /> INTERCHANGE STUDY - 2ND pertinent to this it from P.R.C. <br /> PHASE <br /> Wayne Yoshioka, PRC Engineering Mr. Yoshioka stated as background infor- <br /> mation Phase I of the US 36 Interchange <br /> Study was concluded August 24, 1984, and <br /> a public meeting was held August 16, 1984 <br /> at which time the findings of Phase I were <br /> prepared, namely: <br /> 1) Existing conditions in the study area. <br /> 2) Future projected traffic without any <br /> addtional interchanges in the study <br /> area. <br /> 3) Implications of that future traffic. <br /> Land use projections were also included <br /> for the Louisville, Broomfield, Lafayette, <br /> and Boulder County area in and around the <br /> Superior and Broomfield interchanges. <br /> The findings of that study indicated that <br /> further study was necessary to evaluate <br /> an additional interchange on US 36. Primarily <br /> because they were finding extreme congestion <br /> at the Broomfield interchange and that <br /> the Superior interchange was reaching capa- <br /> city by the year 2000. If some other access <br /> to US 36 was not investigated, there is <br /> potentially a serious problem of circula- <br /> tion within the tri-cities area. An in- <br /> vestigation will be made of alternative <br /> locations and they propose that the addi- <br /> tional interchange will lie somewhere be- <br /> tween the Broomfield and Superior interchanges. <br /> An inventory will be made of the area to <br /> see what the constraints are, i.e. topo- <br /> grpahy, flood plains, subsidence areas, <br /> railroad tracks, existing development, and <br /> proposed development. In addition to these <br /> physical constraints, they will be looking <br /> at capatibility with the regional highway <br /> system, i.e. does it tie into the existing <br /> roads as well as those that we will have <br /> in future, . DRCOG is very adamant that it <br /> be part of a regional system. <br /> Phase 2 of the US 36 Interchange shdy will be <br /> to: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.