Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> the Council will address the enclave issue with <br /> regard to residential annexation policies and <br /> allow the 10 acre site to once again be introduced <br /> to Council for annexation consideration. <br /> The current Resolution #15, establishing a policy <br /> with respect to annexations, is in effect until <br /> March 31 , 1985. <br /> Handley was requested by Council to provide <br /> updates on the water' and sewer situation as <br /> relates to possible annexations. Also, a survey <br /> was requested as to how many such enclaves exist <br /> with in the City limits. <br /> Fauson related to Council that most homeowners <br /> within these enclaves are on the City 's water and <br /> sewer system plus paying special fees, therefore, <br /> not impacting services by possible annexation. <br /> However, bringing these properties up to City <br /> standards, i.e. , curb, gutter, sidewalk, and <br /> streets, would be a financial burden. Fauson <br /> suggested that the City could work out an <br /> agreesent to address these problems. <br /> Luce suggested that the City should address each <br /> enclave request on a case by case basis and should <br /> define small and large enclaves. Necessary <br /> improvements could then be addressed individually <br /> as requests for annexation were presented. <br /> Norris related that enclave annexation of a single <br /> family residence was not a major concern in her <br /> opinion, however , annexation with a request to , - <br /> develop several units was a concern. <br /> Leary's understanding was that the current <br /> resolution did not exclude the annexation of <br /> enclaves. Hundley concurred and suggested that a <br /> greater definition of terms within a new <br /> resolution would be to the City's advantage with <br /> regard to this type of annexation. <br /> Morris moved that Resolution #15 - Series 1984, be <br /> extended for 30 days while staff gathers <br /> information to formulate racosmendations. Johnson <br /> seconded. Cuasen asked to have the motion changed <br /> to read „60 days" to allow ample time for adequate <br /> investigation of all pertinent ispacts. The <br /> motion was so amended and approved unanimously. <br /> UPDATE ON DRCOG <br /> PLANNED URBANIZATION <br /> AREAS Information was supplied to Council regarding • <br /> revision to the Regional Growth and Development <br /> S <br />