My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1985 08 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1985 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1985 08 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:55 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 2:02:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
8/6/1985
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1985 08 06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
' • 4 .2"74-". ;Yr frew <br /> ZoSisvt11s. h . 1,- <br /> e <br /> po+a l 18-10• coat sevia , <br /> - .bt ,r14.111400 meal*cis! • 1a•gsz4. <br /> = asios s�� i , vggrades is- <br /> tsoas ao �= se <br /> sapel , a <br /> i 1, <br /> v • Phare also rslat04 that the disposal o'! <br /> gsarrated bir the- t*"through the iteeie <br /> pwooess woe r *** additional p <br /> s: <br /> .mid deal with There wear additional spears for <br /> of the • • sv <br /> State law s•quirces extensive sonitoria of. <br /> m A <br /> method Louisvilis is using now -- disking <br /> available space on site. Thee will be 1 <br /> available space with either expansion for this <br /> typo of disposal and the extensive State <br /> monitoring is not economically feaaibl• for a <br /> plant of Louisville's also, according to Ihar•. • <br /> Cost analysis and growth scenarios wore given to <br /> Council for review. One option to lower the cost <br /> would be to refinance the 1981 pond issue at a <br /> lower psresatag• rate. Tap and rats increases <br /> were also explored. Phase is consulting with the <br /> City's bond mensal and will look in detail at <br /> these options so that a complete finance package <br /> can be presented to Council. <br /> fundley► stag that the annual tap pro jectioas in <br /> the growth scenarios reflects the residential <br /> equivalent with commercial taps factored in. <br /> Phase related that in his opinion Option C - 2.1 <br /> mgd Expansion - by a large extent indicates the <br /> lowest cost option for a total treatment capacity <br /> of ultimately 3.0 sq0 for Louisville. <br /> Luce askad that figures be 'animated to show the <br /> amount of a possible rate incrasse and what the <br /> structure of that would be over a period of time. <br /> TM* digestion of sludge is coming to a critical <br /> point. Staff hopes to keep this portion of <br /> waat. watar treatment is the total constrnctior <br /> project as there is a cost savings in mina gement <br /> acrd eagiae•r impose.* and also the Pia <br /> ZO011ii111411 batter bide on a total psakag • <br /> Iewev•rt if it aMse to s point that the City has <br /> no tangos deal with the •lodge issue, staff rrL]1 <br /> bi back to Council for oval of they <br /> posti�as of the wastemt•s trestwsa pleat pz+o jaotri <br /> a timetable tax this jest if approved would be <br /> in be' <br /> ' <br /> to socaivs bids early fall with an <br /> M t/ 19N4 ooapletioa date. <br /> • f . - ;s <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.