My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1986 05 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1986 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1986 05 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:56 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 2:23:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
5/20/1986
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1986 05 20
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> • <br /> The Task Force would be advertised in the paper <br /> and staff recommends each Councilaember appoint <br /> two members from each ward and three members would <br /> be appointed by the Mayor 'at large.* <br /> Mohr feels that the expertise is already available <br /> on staff and the citissn input should be directed <br /> at priortising recreation needs and demands, and <br /> what trade offs people are willing to wake. Mohr <br /> suggests IS 'make specific recommendations to City <br /> Council' might be better stated by saying 'issue <br /> findings to City Council and Staff." <br /> Sackett voiced concerns with having the Task Force <br /> making specific recommendations. "Its hard for me <br /> to feel comfortable with setting up a Task Force <br /> to look into all the issues. I would feel more <br /> comfortable if they would give us a needs <br /> request. Then at some point the staff will have <br /> to look at it fro* an economic point of view and <br /> nuke • recommendation. The financial aspect of it <br /> is the most important and staff will have to give <br /> us an honest opinion as to whether or not we can <br /> afford it.' <br /> eundley agreed that the mission should include <br /> what the trade offs are to achieve the goals <br /> identified through the investigation by the Task <br /> Force. <br /> Ssynanski stated that the survey conducted by the <br /> City last year identified • recreation center as a <br /> high priority. aowever, the Special $lection to <br /> fund a recreation center through a sales tax <br /> incrsase was defeated the sate year. Is feels <br /> that Council may be rushing this issue somewhat if <br /> the City is unable to act on Task Force <br /> recommendations. <br /> Anderson agreed that the survey showed a very high <br /> priority in obtaining a recreation center and <br /> feels that the Task Force could 'get us off of <br /> dead center and get the ball rolling. ' There is a <br /> tremendous amount of resources available in the <br /> community and if tapped, these resources could <br /> assist sr. IIioco's Department and develop the type <br /> of recreation the people in this community want. <br /> There must be alternative types of financing, i.e. <br /> public/private partnerships, etc., Anderson <br /> stated, and Council needs an opportunity to have <br /> that information to assess before slamming the <br /> door shut on this issue. <br /> Carnival replied stating that he felt the <br /> Special IIlection on the recreation center failed <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.