My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1986 06 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1986 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1986 06 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:56 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 2:24:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
6/3/1986
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1986 06 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
citizen participation has not been fully nit. <br /> There were no residents in that area when McCaslin <br /> was designed and now there are -- yet everything <br /> is "hardened into concrete' and the interests of <br /> the residents have not been truly addressed. <br /> tundley feels that possibly earlier meetings <br /> should have taken place to bettor inform citizens, <br /> however, KoCaslin has been platted for many years. <br /> Mayor tauson recommended to Council that the City <br /> not hault construction and continue to monitor <br /> progress of. the noise and possible construction of <br /> sound barriers if needed in the future. <br /> Mohr stated that people should realise although <br /> neighboring residents have concerns regarding <br /> their proximity to McCaslin -- it does not mean <br /> that it does not have an important part in the <br /> total comprehensive plan of the City which has <br /> been worked on comprehensively and very carefully <br /> for the past 15 years. Mohr stated that he had a <br /> similar experience when he moved into his house on <br /> Pine Street simply because he did not make himself <br /> aware of the comprehensive plan. Yet he has no <br /> right to stop the ongoing development of that <br /> area. le fully empathises and earlier Meetings <br /> may have helped, however the outcome probably <br /> would not have been any different. There were <br /> over 65 public bearings regarding McCaslin being a <br /> four-lane arterial built to certain <br /> specifications. <br /> In response to a question by Anderson, Rundley <br /> stated that when construction commences, it is a <br /> courtesy to contact area residents. Once <br /> something is platted and the right-of-way is <br /> there, construction may begin immediately or <br /> several years hence. Also, Rundley stated that a <br /> noise impact study was not required for McGslin. <br /> Rautenstraus related that he had in fact reported <br /> to Council his efforts with respect to the <br /> extensive negotiations requesting the property <br /> owners consideration of a different alignment. <br /> Rautenstraus was told by the property owner's <br /> attorney that they would not even consider it as <br /> it would be too detrimental to their property. <br /> They would not negotiate on this point. <br /> Mayor tauson moved that the City <br /> not built construction but continue to monitor <br /> the situation and alleviate some concerns as was <br /> recommended previously. Anderson seconded adding <br /> that the City do what can be done within the <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.