City Council Agenda and Packet 1986 10 21

Home Browse Search

Unfortunately, this didn't happen. However, he will support the adoption of this ordinance, hoping it will work and wait to see what happens. esynanski appreciates the letter sent by the Chamber regarding this issue, but in talking to business owners, Ssymanski found that many felt that certain physical constraints prohibits them from ooaplying to the letter of the ordinance. it is Ssymanski's opinion that it is irresponsible to pass as ordinance that can not be complied with. *We know what 5% of the cowmmatt wants. I don't know what the other 95% of the community wants.* feels that Council should reject the ordinance and let it out for a Special llection. Carnival stated that he appreciates that citisens have the right to peti- tion, however, this proposed ordinance has • lack of concern of what is but for the City. Council's goal was to unite this City and each is striving to accomplish this. Carnival is for smoking control, but does not like the way it was proposed to Council and the citisens of Louisville. Carnival feels that Council should not spend the money to bring it to a Special Ilection and recommends passing it and then see what happens. Scarpella echoed Council's remarks that there is a need for smoking con- trol, but this is not the way to go about it. Scarpella recommends this ordinance be adopted with the understanding that he does not endorse the way it was initiated. Mayor Pauson also resented the way it was initiated and also feels it should be adopted and consider its merits as necessary. Mayor Pauses closed the public hearing and called for a notion. Sackett moved that Council adopt Ordinance 1917 as written. Mayor Pauson seconded. Sy Roll Call Vote, Ordinance 4917 was adopted 6-1 with Szymanski voting no. COMMMU6ACTIOM - OWN= =LAM IHIflSYIVI Mundley explained that on September 19th, the City Clerk, Pam Ferris, received 12 copies of a petition for initiative with 311 signatures con- cerning "An Ordinance enacting • new article to the Louisville Municipal Code to require policies that relate class size and water supply to issuing residential building permits, setting a residential growth rate, limiting residential annexations, maintaining a buffer along O.S. 36, limiting annexations south of U. 6. 36, encouraging the development of a super- market, and requiring an election to change agricultural zoning.* The electors petition Council to pass said ordinance or have the proposed ordinance be submitted to a vote of the registered electors of the City of Louisville for adoption or rejection. Prfgeptef, ggett. s Srik Judson, 240 M. Cedar Kay, and Karen Olson. 460 M. Sycacor• Ct., spoke to Council as representative of the group Coalition On Planning and Mxcellence (COPS). 4