My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1988 03 15
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1988 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1988 03 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:59 PM
Creation date
1/15/2010 11:15:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
3/15/1988
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1988 03 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
151
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• sabools, sto. will o ntinue. flogefOr41, -LoVi <br /> sbonld have the bensfit0 of generating take dl <br /> for its oawunity by having this project locstd if <br /> Louisville. <br /> • Percy Conarroe, editor of the Louisville Times, <br /> stated that be is concerned that all the final <br /> documents are not completely ready for this <br /> evening's meeting. nr. Conarroe stated that <br /> pertinent information is still not available, i.e., <br /> cost of Project, amount of bonds to be issued,,. <br /> intermit rate on these bawds and the, bond's ` <br /> securities Kr Coaarroe urged that Council r�. =a� <br /> extra ,capalulw prior to caking noel, 4 cisio ;: + <br /> Co * so is oel:theat .opposed to, the .401! . . .. '+ . <br /> ;r •• �:., _ ;1 to tr <br /> • <br /> Keyde isuaae stated gnat this in seoona reeding <br /> • <br /> this , although Council does not <br /> necessarily have to reach • decision tonigt. . <br /> In response to Kr. Coaasros's remarks, lendla, <br /> stated that there, are documents that are being 'fins <br /> tuned" and were not yet available tonight. inndiey-" <br /> outlined the specifics of the Annexation Agt* c..: <br /> w explained that the proposed Annexation Agiregmen0 <br /> between the City and Coal Creek Associates lay cult , <br /> the obligations and responsibilities of both <br /> parties, the City and the Annsxor. It reflects <br /> Council's direction to staff that there must be some <br /> ooepellinq benefit to the City in order to consider <br /> this residential annexation. That compelling • <br /> benefit is the golf course which utilises 104 acres <br /> of net new perks/open space land dedicated to the <br /> City with credit enhancements sufficient to minimise <br /> the financial exposure to City residents in general. <br /> 'Wadley continued stating that as with any <br /> annexation, the proposed Annexation Agreement <br /> obligates the annexor to complete certain <br /> improvements as part of their development, water <br /> lines, sewer lines, roads, curbs, gutters, <br /> sidewalks, hiker/biker trails, storm water <br /> detention, etc. <br /> It also specifies the number of residential unite <br /> permitted (450) and the maximum number of units <br /> permitted per year in order to help reduoe the <br /> project's impacts on the City (90 units in y�1 <br /> yew 2 with carry-overt 7$ units each ye the ter <br /> without carry-over). <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.