Laserfiche WebLink
V <br /> • <br /> commence construction during September of this <br /> year. <br /> Mayor lauson asked for any public comments either' <br /> ih favor of or in opposition to Ordinance #960. <br /> Mayor Pauson closed the public hearing and called <br /> for motion. - <br /> Mohr moved and and Perrier* seconded to adopted <br /> Ordinance #960, Series 1986. By Roll Call vote, <br /> the ordinance passed 4-0. <br /> Councilmen 8ockit! sad Anderson returned to the meeting. <br /> ORCINABC3 #961 - SULU 198$ TO MUNICIPAL ILLCIIICA#, COD! <br /> U? PUBLIC MUM Bead title only Ordinance 1941, oONS . <br /> ."AR Ordis 4g a andi Title 15 of, t .; <br /> si oici 1. 'Coils .by adopting by reference t ar. <br /> lt+itlooa slot zival Coda, 19$? Bition.' staff•.is <br /> regi .sting Council place tho ordinance out for‘ ' <br /> publication and a public hearing set for August <br /> 1908.' <br /> This ordinance has been prepared at the request of <br /> the Building Inspection Division to update the <br /> City's llectrical Code by adopting the current <br /> (1987) National Ilectrical Co .,d <br /> • <br /> Mayor lauson moves! that Ordinance #961 be placed <br /> out for publication and a public hearing be set <br /> for August 2, 1968. Anderson seconded. The <br /> motion passed 6-0. <br /> ORDINAMCB #962 - Will 198$ - YOONIIJ RIGHT-OP-WAY VACATION - <br /> SI? PUBLIC U ARI$G Road by title only, Ordinance #962, Series 198$, <br /> "An Ordinance vacating a portion of a right-of-way <br /> (Tr•ct D ) located in Packwood Piling # 2 <br /> (Yoonkin ) . ' Staff reconaend s placing the <br /> Ordinance out for publication and a public beaming <br /> art for August 16, 198$. <br /> Mel applicant. Robert and Carolene Younkin, is <br /> requesting the City vacate ■ portion of right-of- <br /> way known as Tract "A' Parkwood Piling #2. The <br /> tract was originally set aside for future <br /> pedestrian connection to open space and for a 16' <br /> rater transmission line. The water lime is in the <br /> eastern portion of the right-of-way (20' ) and will <br /> remain in City ownership. The western portion of <br /> t e right-of-way (16' ) is no longer considered a <br /> needed option for pedestrian access since such <br /> access exists nearby to lake Park (4 blocks oast <br /> of Tract "D' off of Griffith ) . Planning <br /> 9 <br />