Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> in the metro arse, but that's really not what this <br /> toms is all about.' 'Ln may opinion the City of . <br /> Denver is trying to give suburbs their problss <br /> and they are not willing to wort with us os all ' <br /> Oa problems collectively.' Sackett stated that <br /> the people who have studied this have said this -la - <br /> riat a good deal. <br /> Mt. Stanford stated that Councilcilsan Sackett WAS <br /> incorrect in that Councilman Puckott of Arvada has <br /> personally endorsed this. Sackett felt that was <br /> not true, mt. Stanford stated that this was never <br /> • City of Denver proposal. but was sponsored by . <br /> Senator Strickland. <br /> Mobs Jointed out that ono-tenth of one percent 01%-.1.1 <br /> the City's present sales tax is approeiaately <br /> $45,000. <br /> ,4. Aftror, Taysp•k stay,! A-.10 very �. �1', <br /> tw�r#d .Qf- i res�sing . l oeri tit air are .+ `''""�;'' <br /> iasuee that wet be deoid d that would iaoludr ' ' <br /> increase of soles tart to build a recreation c tt. ',:,: <br /> sad other cagltal improvement projects. Also. :;r'1 " <br /> then. is a school bond /saws nosing up soon. <br /> Mayor Tausou moved and Ferrara seconded to neither <br /> approve or disapprove the Cultural facilities <br /> ballot issw. Unanimous. <br /> 02M Rt <br /> COAL, CUM TWICE - UMW TO Chest.. SITS OP <br /> STUST WIDTR Stahl stated that the developers of the Coal Creek <br /> Ranch Project approached staff and advised them <br /> that as a result of sore in dtpth look at the <br /> market and input by some marketing consultants, <br /> ra feel it will be inappropriate to continuo <br /> tin project with a private street *action is <br /> the Island Area of the subdivision. T S market <br /> would be better satisfied with public streets in <br /> that particular axes. At the last Planning <br /> Commission meeting, this concept was discussed. <br /> The Commission indicated that they would p.rfar to <br /> deal with the issue based on a formal application <br /> from the Coal Creek Ranch Group. What staff is <br /> s.guesting this evening is Council input so that <br /> staff can nova forward and approve the <br /> construction drawings for a cross-section which <br /> would enable the Coal Creek Rauch Group to move <br /> forward wlsila weather still permits this year. If <br /> it becomes necessary to wait for the formal <br /> process of approving a replat for the subdivision, <br /> potentially we loose the astir* balanos of this <br /> year as a building season. <br /> 14 <br />