My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1992 10 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1990-1999 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1992 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1992 10 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:47:04 PM
Creation date
1/15/2010 2:19:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
10/20/1992
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1992 10 20
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
290
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
submitting a request for additional offioers. <br /> Lassen: I do. <br /> DI SIGI /MOTIOM - TIMM J. SEATON AM SRATION LITTER or <br /> Imo'! IMCLAV1 AT SALM STRUT, 1I? 01 ) ZX$I T AM OS <br /> John Franklin, Community Development Direotoi, explained that <br /> prospective annexors submit a letter of interest giving the City an <br /> indication of what their proposed development might be. He stated <br /> that 14r. Seaton and his rife, Barbara, were in the audience. <br /> Timothy J. asaton, 1012 Jefferson Avenue, Louisville. CO, stated <br /> that they purchased about •4 of an sore located at the end of <br /> Walnut Street, Which is surrounded on three (3) sides by existing <br /> property within the City. They are proposing that the sorting be <br /> RI, Which would be no more than two (2) lots. They plan to build <br /> only one (1) house within the next three (3) years. They felt it <br /> would be compatible with the existing property already surrounding <br /> the area. <br /> Mayer: You're intending to sake that as <br /> part of a greater POD. <br /> Seaton: That's our plan, rather than sons it <br /> separately. We propose to do it as <br /> a single PVD with this property to <br /> the north. <br /> Slayer: I think your parcel 3.s very <br /> strategic in the way that whole area <br /> gets developed. Some of it is RR in <br /> that area. The Catholic church is <br /> RE. The land just east of <br /> Pridgefield is RR. The land <br /> adjacent to you is U. I would like <br /> to see what the whole plan is going <br /> to look like. It you're just asking <br /> to develop your parcel, I think that <br /> is one thing. It it's going to lie a <br /> part of a such larger development <br /> picture, I would want to see what <br /> that is before deciding on coning. <br /> Seaton: we wanted to make sure that the <br /> plans for our property wess <br /> consistent with t 3e surrounding <br /> area. it makes sense that because <br /> it is a strategic parcel, there be a <br /> uniform plan for that area. That's <br /> why we had hoped to rove forward <br /> with a joint WD, rather than just <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.