My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1992 10 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1990-1999 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1992 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1992 10 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:47:04 PM
Creation date
1/15/2010 2:19:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
10/20/1992
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1992 10 20
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
290
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
would allow two (2) lots. <br /> Sowards 241,, getting two (2) rignals from <br /> you, -111r. 11r. Seaton. The first signal <br /> is that you're really only. <br /> interested in providing for our awn <br /> wherewithal. The second signal is <br /> that you're interested in having two <br /> (2) lots and have had discussions <br /> with the adjacent property owner to <br /> help ensure that you're going to <br /> have two (2) lots. If the true <br /> intent is to tie together those two <br /> (2) lots into r larger subdivision <br /> that could perhaps carry through <br /> from the RS to the north of your <br /> property and, perhaps, the property <br /> to the south of you That's • <br /> little dittmrer►t from your original <br /> assertion. lost is it that you <br /> really want? <br /> Beaton* We've got this small parcel, which <br /> is critical to the development of <br /> that area. We plan to build one (1) <br /> house there and it appears that Rs <br /> zoning is appropriate. Therefore, <br /> it there is enough square footage <br /> after working out thee/moment issue <br /> to allow us two (2) lots, we vault <br /> like to go ahead and get gonad for <br /> two (2) lots. We would agree to <br /> only build one (1) house within <br /> three (3) or four (4) years, because <br /> loga of school crowding issues or <br /> whatever. In order to get access to <br /> the property to the north, which is <br /> within the City, we have to address <br /> the road issue. We're trying to <br /> work out something that is not <br /> "piece seal'", which allows us to <br /> proceed with RS zoning for this <br /> property and addresses road, water, <br /> sewer, and whatever else would be <br /> necessary to develop our parcel. <br /> Hornbastels Sow many acres ors in the boulder <br /> County parcel? <br /> /rankling I think it is 30 acres. <br /> Hornbostels do, in an RS zoning and 30 acres, <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.