My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1992 10 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1990-1999 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1992 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1992 10 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:47:04 PM
Creation date
1/15/2010 2:19:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
10/20/1992
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1992 10 20
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
290
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
this area? <br /> Jorgensen: I personally have not seen any <br /> reports regarding the subsidence in <br /> this area. <br /> Franklin: The reference for subsidence risk is <br /> a study performed under the auspices <br /> of the State of Colorado and Boulder <br /> County by Dames & Moore for the <br /> entire Louisville and Lafayette <br /> areas. On the saps it identifies no <br /> under mining or subsidence risk in <br /> this area. That is the reference we <br /> use when we look at development <br /> applications. <br /> Redding: The drainage report or the erosion <br /> control plan, is this something in <br /> progress or you refer to some plan <br /> that had been dons in earlier years? <br /> Is this available for us to look at? <br /> Jorgensen: The storm water management plan <br /> which I referred to is a recent <br /> requirement of the State. Kormally, <br /> the City of Louisville, in addition, <br /> requires an erosion control plan to <br /> go along with tie over lot grading <br /> plan. The requirements of the storm <br /> water control plan is that you <br /> submit it 10 days prior to any <br /> construction and they review and <br /> approve your plan. <br /> Redding: In regard to your opening comments <br /> about the access to South Boulder <br /> Road, I don't see her you could have <br /> this development without that <br /> access. Do you plan to haves a <br /> traffic light or has one ever been <br /> discussed for that location? <br /> Jorgensen: In Planning Commission this was <br /> brought up and at that time the <br /> staff did not feel there was any <br /> warrant for a signal at that <br /> location given the traffic counts. <br /> Hornbostel s on the document Sheffield Hoses gave <br /> us there was a letter, which <br /> referred to some items that had <br /> 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.