My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1992 10 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1990-1999 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1992 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1992 10 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:47:04 PM
Creation date
1/15/2010 2:19:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
10/20/1992
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1992 10 20
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
290
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
w , <br /> clarification on it. On the third <br /> question it says it's the drainage <br /> plan for the subdivision complete. <br /> I've looked at this map and it says <br /> under "C" that the designated <br /> detention areas within the open <br /> 'Apace contain capacity for almost <br /> double the minimum required by the <br /> City. Is that detention area <br /> located in the City open space <br /> property on this property? <br /> Jorgensen: It's located within outlot C, which <br /> is the City open space area. It was <br /> a part of the original subdivision <br /> deve'opaent. In other words, this <br /> detention is used for the existing <br /> Hillsborough West subdivision, as <br /> well as the proposed Ridgeview <br /> subdivision. „ <br /> Hornbost.l: - Is there going to be any wetlands <br /> mitigation? <br /> Jorgensen: The wetlands area is primarily <br /> within the City open space. we <br /> don't plan to be within that area, <br /> other than to construct the roadway. <br /> Primarily, the area that you're �« <br /> referrictq to as wetlands is one of <br /> the existing detention ponds. There <br /> are two (2) detention ponds in the <br /> site: one is located north toward <br /> South Boulder. Road; the other larger <br /> detention pond is in the southeast <br /> corner. <br /> Hornbostel s I'm not really pleased with the fact <br /> that we're going to be providing <br /> detention for the subdivision, <br /> We're talking about erosion control <br /> on the north side. What happens to <br /> our open space in the back? Are we <br /> going to have a pond back there? I <br /> don't see where you're providing for <br /> detention for wnat's coding off of <br /> this property. <br /> Jorgensen: There is • detailed report, which I <br /> have a copy of here, which was <br /> submitted to step!! as a part of the <br /> subdivision requirements for their <br /> 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.