City Council Agenda and Packet 1992 11 17

Home Browse Search

Officer the latitude to be able to enforce the "Ooq at Lar " ". Mayers I feel that there is a little too mash intrusion. I would like now more background information. I'm won4erinq if we shouldn't lay this ordinance over to the rent council meeting. Davidsons Kevin, dQ you suggest that on page 7 WO OM a MUdwr t, birds of Pray? Sowards I think "raptors* is the official definition. But,, yes. Oriffithes Mat we would want to do is to strike the "or" after 6, add a new 7, which say* "raptors". &M after •raptor*' put ", or.... ". and then go on with the ordfnanaa as it currently reads. Mward mod that Council approve Ordinance Ito. 1065, aeries 1992 at 2nd Reading, as amended. Seconded by Beddir4. Moll call was taken. Notion passed by a 3-0 vote with Lathrop and Sisk being absent. ORDIMMI Z NO. 1086, •RRXZS 1992 RUMATING OI SMAML30 OR YtBICXAS - 2KO - FQ=C kRaRMG (FOOMs► M I&Yb. TIM 10/7/92 i 10/14/92) Griffiths read by title only ordinance No. 1086, Seri" 1992, "An ordinances regulating diwwntled or inoperative vehicles.• Davidson oDoned the Public Hearing askinq for a staff presentation. Ouaan Griffiths, city attorney, atatod that Councils Sisk had asked a question about whether the right culprit for enforoement was identified in the ordinance. She stated that as a result of that question they went beak to the Prosecuting Attorney and asked if he h" any suggestion* for change. He oorssultrd with Sisk and together they cnnaiuded that the aesndment that is sot forth in the memo dated Oataber 16, 1992 should be proposed. The effect of the aaarWsent is to make the owner or person in control of the inoperative vehicle the responsible party under the ordinance rather than the property owner /tenant, she stated that that was the change that was suggested and it was accepted by councilman Sisk and by the Prosecuting Attorney. That was her recommendation to council. Davidson called for anyone in the audimwe who wished to speak in f