Laserfiche WebLink
<br />..,1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />DISCUSSION/MOTION - GEORGE MATTERN/ANNEXATION LETTER OF INTEREST <br /> <br />Franklin: It is Council's practice to receive and <br />consider letters of interest from <br />property owners who wish to annex or <br />propose to annex to the ci ty. This <br />arrangement provides a mechanism for City <br />Council to consider the possible policy <br />and financial implication of an <br />annexation request. It also gives the <br />property owner essentially a free look at <br />what the City is thinking or what the <br />policy/plans are as far as their property <br />and its annexation. George Mattern is a <br />property owner, the property is located <br />in the southeast part of "Old Louisville" <br />along the Colorado Tech Center area. Mr. <br />Mattern has expressed interest in <br />annexation. Staff is seeking from you <br />direction how to proceed with the <br />annexation request. <br /> <br />Sackett: Providing utilities to the site is that a <br />major cost or do we have utilities close <br />by? <br /> <br />Franklin: The Colorado Tech Center first filing <br />extends eastward to the west boundary of <br />Mr. Mattern's property. We have found <br />that there is water and sewer lines <br />parallel to his west boundary. Further <br />discussion with Public Works reveals that <br />we could possibly see that connection to <br />water and to sewer. <br /> <br />Mayor Fauson moved to direct staff to proceed with the annexation <br />process, seconded by Sackett. All in favor. <br /> <br /> <br />DISCUSSION/MOTION REGARDING BALLOT ISSUE FOR NOVEMBER 5, 1991 <br />ELECTION ON USE TAX <br /> <br />Brand explained that Councilwoman Hornbostel and Councilman <br />Davidson asked at the last work session that this issue be <br />discussed at the next Council session. Councilman Davidson and <br />Councilwoman Hornbostel had both commented on this in November when <br />Council discussed the ordinance that was passed at that time to <br />remove the inequity that existed by residential building materials <br />being bought outside the City with no use tax imposed and inside <br />the City with sales tax added. That was Ordinance No. 1034. They <br />have pointed out that the last whereas, on the copy of the <br />ordinance says, "The City recognizes this disadvantage and wishes <br /> <br />10 <br />