Laserfiche WebLink
development to the <br />east preserve view <br />corridors towards the <br />mountains. Several <br />individuals favored a <br />medium density <br />neighborhood that <br />could introduce need- <br />ed housing products <br />for the eastern half. <br />Other individual's <br />suggested that the <br />eastern area be conv- <br />erted into a passive <br />park. <br />Group 3 <br />6 <br />For Area 1 (Northeast Louisville), this group discouraged a large civic use <br />located beyond the downtown area. New housing could be patio homes oriented <br />toward seniors, affordable housing, housing oriented to transit users, and /or <br />multi - generational housing. High density residential should be considered <br />adjacent to the railroad. This area should be well- connected with trails along the <br />railroad, to downtown, and across Highway 42 to connect to Hecla Lake and <br />Waneka Lake with pedestrian underpasses across major arterials. The <br />gateways should be unique to Louisville. S. Boulder Road could function more <br />as a gateway if open space were preserved to the north to compliment existing <br />open space to the south, although Highway 42 is a more predominant gateway. <br />Some individuals suggested a park with sports fields along S. Boulder Road, <br />while others recommended mixed use with boutique retail, so as to not compete <br />with existing retailers. The possibility of a joint LaFayette - Louisville regional park <br />was also discussed. <br />Area 3 (Colorado Technology Center) concerns centered on the introduction of <br />new retail commercial uses at strategic intersections near the Colorado <br />Technology Center. Some encouraged retail in order to generate sales tax, while <br />others did not want new retail to compete with downtown. Some were concerned <br />that new retail would not be supported by the market and that employees would <br />continue to shop at regional centers. If retail were to occur, is should be targeted <br />only at employers rather than 24/7 services. They felt that the CTC was a good <br />location for Tight industrial, although there was debate over whether additional <br />office should be encouraged according to market demand. Trail connectivity, <br />transit, and pedestrian connectivity both within and around CTC was strongly <br />encouraged. <br />