My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historical Survey Report 1992
PORTAL
>
HISTORICAL RECORDS (50.000)
>
HISTORIC SURVEY INFORMATION
>
Historical Survey Report 1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2024 8:52:24 AM
Creation date
4/16/2024 11:28:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Doc Type
Historical Records
Signed Date
8/1/1982
Record Series Code
50.000
Record Series Name
Historical Records
Quality Check
4/21/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
as new mines continued to open, often with absentee owners. In <br />1879, C. C. Welch sold the Welch Mine to Jay Gould, president <br />of the Union Pacific. Gould was then in the process of consoli- <br />dating most of Colorado's northern lines under U.P. control, in- <br />cluding the Colorado Central. Miners increasingly came to the <br />conclusion that owners like Gould were not responsive to their <br />demands for improved safety precautions, and wage and hour con- <br />cessions. Organizing came to be seen as the only means to achieve <br />these demands as the rapid development of the coal fields brought <br />competition for scarce jobs, aggravated by the summer lay-off <br />period. Miners tended to organize into local unions before the <br />the effectiveness of the national U.M.W. was demonstrated in the <br />1890's. Besides striking for wage, hour and safety benefits, <br />the issue of mines employing strike breakers became a major point <br />of contention. Many immigrants were brought to the area as strike <br />breakers without understanding the issues or the resentment of <br />the strikers. <br />What is most significant for a discussion of Louisville's <br />development during this period, is the impact the strikes had <br />on the local economic situation. What little gains the miners <br />eventually received were more than often offset by the curtail- <br />ment of production during the prolonged strike periods. The strike <br />of 1910-1914, which was held in sympathy with the coal miners <br />of the southern fields and required federal troops to finally <br />settle, brought severe setbacks to coal production levels. The <br />mines never really fully recovered from those devastating years. <br />The peak years of 1907, (760,023 tons produced from Louisville's <br />twelve mines), and 1909, (753,827 tons from thirteen mines); there- <br />forliirectly correspond to the high water mark of Louisville's <br />early economic development. This fact is born out by the rate <br />of building construction and additions to the town before 1910. <br />During and immediately after the strike years, the town seems to <br />have struggled to consolidate the gains it had made with very <br />little new construction taking place. The violence associated <br />with the strike undoubtedly discouraged many from moving to or <br />investing in the area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.