My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2011 02 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2011 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2011 02 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:49:45 AM
Creation date
2/17/2011 1:58:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2011 02 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Gregg stated th <br />there is no restri <br />Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 13, 2011 <br />Page 4 of 14 <br />Boulder Creek Life and Home is seeking senior friendly housing for the <br />site thus the request for the amendments. <br />• Amendments to the PUD include the 4' setback and 65% lot coverage <br />only on those lots which are 42' wide or smaller. <br />• The applicant and staff continue to work on the wording for Note #9 <br />regarding the 5' drainage. <br />Staff recommends approval with the following condition: <br />1) The applicant shall continue to work with staff on the conditions stated <br />in the December 15 and December 20, 2010 memo's provided by <br />Craig Duffin, Assistant City Engineer <br />Commission Questions of Staff. <br />Brauneis and McCartney discussed the setback a a ything will <br />encroach into the setback. <br />Lipton and McCartney discussed there is no change to the den <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />David Gregg, Boulder Creek Life and Home, provi <br />loaded lots, and the lot coverage. He also shove <br />elevations for the senior friendly . ng. He brie <br />building standards. <br />Commission Questions of Applica <br />Sheets discussed with Gregg the sq e f tage of the roposed homes and <br />what will be used to keep the home owners ip for s- ors. <br />overview of the alley <br />amples of floor plans and <br />discussed their green <br />size from 1,200 to 1,700 SF. He also stated <br />to maintai ownerships by seniors only. <br />Brauneis - _ -. for . ion . ' patio. <br />Greg • • • k p: • s adjacent to the back wall of the adjacent garage. <br />Br- - is asked for - expla . n of the patio cover. <br />Gregg -d the cover will be s all and next to the door. <br />Lipton ask - • ow the patio accommodates proper drainage. <br />Gregg stated •a o will follow the grading of the lot for proper drainage. <br />Lipton asked if th- ould be any steps. <br />Gregg stated the front might have a step but the rear will not. <br />Loo asked who is responsible for the area outside the fences. <br />Gregg stated the homeowners association will maintain the property outside the <br />fence area. <br />Loo discussed with Gregg other options for the patio. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.