Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 11, 2024 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />Hirt explained that some issues had arisen since public notice was issued. He said that <br />staff recommended continuing the application to the next scheduled meeting. <br />Motion to continue Resolution 3, Series 2024, was moved by Baskett and seconded by <br />Choi. The motion was adopted by a vote of 7 to 0. <br />b) Louisville Housing Plan — consideration of draft Housing Plan prior to <br />presentation to City Council for consideration of adoption <br />Staff Presentation: <br />Hirt introduced a presentation for the City's draft Housing Plan. He said that it was up to <br />the Commission as to whether they wanted to vote to recommend approval of the plan to <br />the City Council. He explained what the plan covered, why it was needed, and the <br />adjacent efforts the City was conducting. <br />Commissioner Questions of Staff. <br />Brauneis asked whether there were statistics in the plan relating to area median income. <br />Zuccaro said that between 120% and 140% of area median income could be considered <br />workforce housing. He noted that many tech companies were struggling to recruit workers <br />in Louisville due to the high cost of housing. <br />Choi asked whether the numbering of strategies indicated an order of precedence. <br />Hirt said no, and that they had considered not numbering them to help avoid confusion <br />regarding this. He suggested that they could preface this to make clear that they are not <br />numbered in order of precedence. He then explained how they arrived at the layout of the <br />options in the plan. <br />Mihaly asked how the proposed timeline of the Housing Plan related to the timeline of <br />the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Hirt said that adoption of the Housing Plan would dovetail into the drafting of the <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />There was a discussion as to what an endorsement of the Plan by the Commission would <br />entail, and whether it would have an impact on the City Council's consideration of the <br />plan. There was a general agreement that the Commission should recommend the Plan <br />to Council. <br />Bangs asked what the net new rate of new property construction was prior to the Marshall <br />Fire. <br />Zuccaro said that it was more than 25 per year before 2017, though it had dropped to <br />around 10 each year since then, notwithstanding the fire. <br />Bangs wondered whether this level of growth would be comparable to previous decades. <br />Zuccaro said that this would not be unprecedented compared to the 1980s and 1990s, <br />but would be more than had been constructed in the past decade. <br />