My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2024 09 11
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
OPEN SPACE ADVISORY BOARD
>
2024 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2024 09 11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2024 9:58:33 AM
Creation date
9/12/2024 9:56:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
9/11/2024
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Quality Check
9/12/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Divisions receiving equal representation and expertise during the process. <br />OSAB Feedback: <board to provide input here> <br />2) Dose the framework of topics sufficiently cover your division? Are there other topics <br />that come to mind that we should include for your division or others? <br />OS Staff Feedback: Other possible topics include: <br />a. Protocols/Procedures: Signage best practices and style guides, concept and <br />appropriateness of recreation activities such as nature play, single track, geo <br />cache, etc. in different classifications. <br />b. Updates to municipal codes for Ranger enforcement as needed. <br />c. Prioritization and support of Management Plans for topics such as: water <br />rights, acquisition, weed control, prairie restoration, riparian restoration, <br />wildlife management, reassessing Open Space land classifications (preserve, <br />protect, visitor, other etc.), etc. <br />OSAB Feedback: <board to provide input here> <br />3) Does the outline of public input seem appropriate? Too much or too little? <br />OS Staff Feedback: For the add alternates (Trails & Cottonwood/Lake Park Plans) <br />consider having 1 open house and 2 board specific meetings, as opposed what is <br />currently proposed (2 open houses, 1 board specific meeting). Or alternatively, an open <br />house for initial input (that board members could attend) and then follow up with the <br />boards on first draft so the board can review more detailed work. <br />OSAB Feedback: <board to provide input here> <br />4) Does the list of deliverables seem appropriate? Are there other deliverables you think <br />would be helpful? <br />OS Staff Feedback: Yes, the deliverables seem appropriate. <br />OSAB Feedback: <board to provide input here> <br />5) Are there other suggested adjustments to the document? <br />OS Staff Feedback: <br />A. Consider to continue clarifying that the PROS plan won't cover detailed <br />management topics such as prairie dogs, weed control, water rights, etc. for the <br />Open Space division. More specifically call out that the consultant should identify <br />and prioritize all future planning efforts with efficient grouping of certain plans, and <br />proposed costs. <br />B. Further clarify what level of inventory and analysis will be done for existing <br />amenities, programs and services. <br />C. Clarify to what extent each Division's list of project and priorities will be compiled <br />into a Department -wide list of priorities. <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.