My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Parks and Public Landscaping Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2024 11 06
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PARKS AND PUBLIC LANDSCAPING ADVISORY BOARD (fka HORTICULTURE FORESTRY ADVISORY BOARD)
>
2024 Parks and Public Landscaping Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Parks and Public Landscaping Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2024 11 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2024 12:44:55 PM
Creation date
10/30/2024 12:06:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
11/6/2024
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Parks and Public Landscaping Advisory Board <br />October 2, 2024 <br />Page 5 of 12 <br />• Minimum new trees would be 2 in but might be nice to have 3+ trees at the <br />start <br />Public comments <br />• Laura Scherer: have a city -mandated ash borer projection for existing trees, <br />will patio be close to the ash trees and damage roots? Patio: kids bike <br />through that area and public art could be impediment, esp. in dark, no <br />cement seating (obstruction and uncomfortable), would want some <br />plantings for privacy from their property. neighborhood not super excited <br />about the idea of gathering area. Existing landscaping along lower edge - <br />survived the fire; keep those there and don't remove <br />• Mark Redpath - great improvement on the design, could push plaza up and <br />left so it's not in the middle of the thoroughfare, shielding along northwest <br />(that neighbor has tall fence), would still be OK with removal of plaza <br />• Will Scherer - looks great, plaza - echoing Laura's concerns, won't work with <br />the way that the park is used. Maybe art could go along Washington? <br />Keep existing cobble and landscaping on SE corner of park, request to <br />possibly replace tree at North part of the park closest to Washington <br />• Jeff Todd - plan looks great, grassy area is great and looking forward to <br />resodding and irrigation. <br />• Councilmember Fahey, emphasize EDI/access for seating off of Washington. <br />PPLAB Board comments <br />• Not necessarily concrete but metal, stone and backless benches <br />• Landscaping beds around the park not yet defined - next step <br />• If we did pursue public art, placing it closer to Washington is a good idea. <br />And/or Public art could be woven into garden bed lower in park. <br />• Doesn't seem like we've been hearing a lot of support recently for the plaza <br />• Sunflower would be flush, concrete/crushed granite/other flat hardscape <br />• Edging beds are beautiful and good idea along west/residence. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.