Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Finance Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 17, 2024 <br />Page 2of4 <br />Committee Comments: <br />Councilmember Hoefner asked if Chandler believes it will be a soft landing. Julie Hughes responded that <br />Chandler does believe it will be a soft landing. <br />Councilmember Hamlington asked if there are any changes to the portfolio planned in order to position <br />the city well for upcoming economic changes. Julie Hughes responded that the portfolio is very well <br />positioned at this time. <br />Public Comments: None. <br />Utility Rate Update: <br />The Director of Public Works provided a presentation on the 2025 preliminary utility rates. The presentation <br />was included in the meeting packet. After Fiscal Year End, Public Works will come back to the committee <br />with a report on 2024 actuals and a final proposal for 2025 utility rates. <br />Committee Comments: <br />Councilmember Hoefner asked about the risks of option D. The Deputy Director of Utilities responded that, <br />as we move funds from the Water fund to the Wastewater fund, we anticipate that the Water fund has <br />enough balance to cover the expenditure. If there is an unexpected expenditure, less funds will end up <br />being available and would lower the flexibility of the Water fund. <br />Councilmember Hamlington asked if money could be moved from the General Fund to the Water fund if <br />an event happened which would deplete the water fund. The Director of Finance responded that he doesn't <br />believe this is possible because enterprise funds are generally required to pay their own way. The Director <br />of Finance will confer with Legal and follow up with the committee on Legal's opinion in this matter. <br />Councilmember Hoefner asked if the cash reserve presented on the water slide included the loan option. <br />The Deputy Director of Utilities responded that the slide in question does include option D. The Director <br />of Public Works added that the biggest risk to utility rate estimates is seasonal weather impacts. <br />There was a discussion about smoothing rates. <br />Councilmember Hamlington asked for more information about the O&M Turnback to better understand <br />the history of the 10% turnback amount in relation to the proposal for 0%. The Director of Public Works <br />responded that city utilities had always modeled 0% turnback in the past while the general fund uses 10% <br />turnback in its modeling. During the 2022-2023 budget process direction was received from the Interim <br />Mayor and City Council to align utilities' turnback approach with the general fund. Having 0% turnback <br />would enable staff to perform more accurate estimates. <br />Councilmember Hoefner commented that he would prefer to see the city to move away from turnback as <br />a budgeting tool and instead having more accurate budgets with money the city expects to spend in a <br />year. <br />