My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2006 02 07
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2006 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2006 02 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:41:47 PM
Creation date
1/31/2007 1:31:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
2/7/2006
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2006 02 07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> City Council <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> February 7,2006 <br /> Page 10 of 18 <br />Council member Clabots stated as Council's liaison to the Horticulture & Forestry <br />Board, he is concerned with maintenance of trees and use of pesticides. <br />Council member Marsella noted the ordinance lacked a prohibition of storage of <br />private property on open space land. Land Management Director Robson <br />confirmed that was not included in the ordinance. City Attorney Light stated, the <br />City as a property owner of open space land, has other recourses and suggested <br />adding a provision to Subsection R prohibiting any personal property storage on <br />open space land. <br />Council member Marsella stated the issue is not the type of garden, or the length <br />of time the garden has been planted, but the fact the land is owned by all the <br />citizens of Louisville. <br />MOTION: Council member Sackett moved to continue Ordinance No. 1483, <br />Series 2006, for two weeks. There was no second to the motion. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Brown asked if the closure of the open space would prohibit <br />neighbors from entering the open space through their open space entry gates. <br />Land Management Director Robson stated it would preclude such entry if it was <br />determined there was a danger to either the public or wildlife. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Brown inquired as to administrative rule discretion. He asked <br />what recourse a citizen would have. City Manager Simmons stated this <br />ordinance is no different than any city ordinance, where an officer would exercise <br />discretion. The recourse would be through the Department Director, City <br />Manager and City Council. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Brown summarized there had been substantial discussion on the <br />public notice process; ordinance prohibitions; and open space encroachments. <br />He agreed the tone of the ordinance is more regulatory than necessary. He <br />supported a grandfathering clause, requiring a permit, fee and contained size, <br />and if the resident failed to obtain the permit, the garden use would be prohibited. <br />He felt some uses should be prohibited, such as the storage of personal property <br />on open space land. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Brown requested public comment. <br />Robert Sanford, 322 S. Jefferson Avenue, Louisville, CO supported Mayor Pro <br />Tem Brown's proposal and suggested phasing out the gardens over a period of <br />time. He requested the cost of open space maintenance and a time table. He <br />stated his expectation of Council is if the ordinance passes, the City will maintain <br />the open space land. <br /> . . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.