Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> City Council <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> February 7,2006 <br /> Page 6 of 18 <br />Dennis Richmond, 306 Chestnut Street, Louisville, CO asked Council member <br />Muckle to recuse himself voting on Ordinance No. 1483. He also requested <br />Section R & U not be voted on until Mayor Sisk returns. <br />Council member Muckle stated he and City Council received extensive ethics <br />training two weeks ago. He was advised by the City Attorney that he does not <br />have a conflict of interest. According to the Ethics Code a financial interest <br />constitutes a conflict of interest and he does not have a financial interest. <br />City Attorney Light stated the Code of Ethics defines a financial interest of <br />gaining or avoiding financial loss. He noted a Charter rule that if a board or <br />commission member is elected to City Council, they are automatically deemed to <br />have given up the seat on the board or commission. He explained the ordinance <br />is a legislative matter, not quasi-judicial. After discussions with Council member <br />Muckle, the City Attorney determined there is no conflict of interest. <br />Pat Hornbostel, 655 W. Hawthorne, Louisville, CO, reviewed the history of the <br />City's open space properties prior to the Open Space Management Plan. He <br />explained the encroachments in the Open Space land had not been monitored; <br />however the Charter mandates the preservation of open space land, which <br />requires legislative action. He stated the Open Space Advisory Board followed <br />the Home Rule Charter in the development of the Open Space Rules and <br />Regulations. He supported passage of the ordinance. <br />Michael Gulletta, 995 Estes Way, Louisville, CO Open Space Advisory Board <br />Chairperson, urged Council to adopt the Rules and Regulations as submitted. <br />He reviewed the Board's procedure in the adoption of the rules and regulations <br />and explained the Board's meetings were properly noticed. There was very little <br />public comment until after the rules and regulations were passed, then several <br />comments were received by residents who had neighborhood gardens, primarily <br />in Dutch Creek. He explained the Board did listen to their comments and <br />considered compromises, but ultimately followed the mandates of the Charter. <br />Nancy Harper, 256 S. Jefferson Avenue, Louisville, CO expressed her support <br />for keeping the neighborhood garden. She explained she's had her garden for <br />13 years and was granted permission to have this open space garden by the <br />City. She asked existing gardens be grandfathered in. <br />Susan Morris, 939 W. Maple Court, Louisville, CO stated the citizens of Louisville <br />have always supported open spaces. She did not support encroachment and <br />stressed it is not an appropriate use of open space. She stated open space <br />property is owned by all the people and not just the people whose homes border <br />the open space. She emphasized it can be a refuge for wildlife or a recreational <br />area for the citizens. She urged Council to support the ordinance. <br />