My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2006 05 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2006 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2006 05 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:41:47 PM
Creation date
1/31/2007 1:38:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
5/2/2006
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2006 05 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> City Council <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> May 2, 2006 <br /> Page 9 of 13 <br />Cecilia Girz, 4669 Ingram Court, Boulder, CO asked how the PEG fees could be <br />considered a tax. Mayor Sisk explained PEG fees can be reversed at any time, <br />and Louisville cable television users are taxed or pay a $0.50 monthly PEG fee. <br />John Bollinger, 143 Salina Street, Louisville, CO explained the $50,000 technical <br />grant will be used for the facility. The PEG fees will be used for the purchase of <br />equipment. He stressed it is critical that CCTV gets a portion of the PEG fees to <br />purchase equipment. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Council member Muckle asked for clarification with respect to CCTV logo and <br />trademark. City Attorney Light reviewed Section 6A, Copyrighting. <br />Council member Muckle voiced his support of Mr. Stewart's suggestion that the <br />City go out to bid on equipment for the both the governmental and public access <br />television needs. <br />Peter Stewart, 1132 Jefferson Avenue, Louisville, CO acknowledged he was <br />remiss in not recognizing and thanking the City Staff, past and present City <br />Council members and consultants for their efforts in the franchise agreement with <br />Comcast. He thanked everyone who helped negotiate the franchise agreement. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Brown stressed the importance of the governmental access. He <br />supported adding language that the Board of Directors could include non-city <br />residents when there is funding from other communities. He was encouraged <br />that CCTV is seeking other funding sources, and cautioned with the declining <br />sales tax, the City may not be in a position to fund public access television. <br />Mayor Sisk suggested the City and CCTV endeavor to meet the equipment <br />needs for governmental and public access television operations, and each <br />should provide a purchase list no later than July 15, 2006, for the bid process. <br />City Attorney Light stated if the equipment needs for both the government and <br />CCTV access go beyond $80,000, a supplemental budget appropriation would <br />be required. <br />Council member Muckle suggested any termination without cause require a <br />unanimous vote of the City Council. Council member Marsella suggested taking <br />the provision out. <br />MOTION: Council member Muckle moved to approve Resolution No. 22, Series <br />2006, with authorization for the Mayor to negotiate and approve the final <br />changes, including the termination without cause provision, and consideration of <br />rental of the equipment. Council member Yarnell seconded the motion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.