City Council Minutes 2006 05 16 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Council Meeting Minutes May 16, 2006 Page 6 of 12 The applicant has submitted the same materials to Council, which were reviewed by the Planning Commission at public hearings held on February 9,2006 and March 9, 2006. The applicant's written materials submitted on May 8,2006 reflect the following two changes: 1) The ownership model has been revised from selling each unit off as a condominium, to leasing units by a single ownership entity. 2) The applicant has agreed to remove the dump station from the PUD proposal. Staff recommended approval subject to eleven conditions. City Attorney Durfee requested the City Council by motion, formally include in the record of the public hearing the following documents: The final subdivision replat and final development plan application filed by the applicant; all other documents the applicant has filed with the City in connection with the applications; all materials included in the City Council packets; all referral comments received on the application; the minutes of the Planning Commission's hearings on the applications; the City's zoning and subdivision ordinances, the City's Industrial Development Design Guidelines; the City's Comprehensive Plan and any other public records prepared or received by the Planning Department in reference to this proposed final subdivision replat and PUD. MOTION: Mayor Sisk moved the documents outlined by the City Attorney be entered into the record of the hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Brown seconded the motion. All in favor. Mayor Sisk requested an Applicant presentation. Mr. John King, Securecare Self Storage, Inc., 9226 Teddy Lane, Lone Tree, CO, explained the proposal is for indoor storage or warehousing and no outdoor storage would be allowed. The units are intended for sale as condominiums for storage. He addressed the applicants' request for parking relief and explained there isn't a need for off-street parking in this project. He addressed the concerns of the Planning Commissions; the onsite project management; long- term maintenance; and adequate visual clearance for police and fire protection. He stressed the storage proposal is compliant with the City of Louisville's Comprehensive Plan. Mayor Sisk requested public comment. There were no comments. COUNCIL COMMENT Council member Marsella inquired as to the ownership of the common areas and the land. Mr. King stated the common areas and the land will be maintained by the owners and only the storage units will be sold. Mayor Pro Tem Brown asked if Mr. King owns other storage units in the area. Mr. King stated his company owns several storage unit properties.