City Council Minutes 1999 04 06 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Davidson stated that it appears Council is discussing permission for the developer to proceed through a Special Review Use to build something nicer than he would have built otherwise. He questioned why Council would want to restrict the developer from doing that. Lathrop moved that Council approve Ordinance No. 1295, Series 1999 - An Ordinance Amending Title 17 Of The Louisville Municipal Code, Entitled 'Zoning', By Amending The Planned Community Zone District General Development Plan For Certain Land Designated As The Business Center At C.T.C., on second and final reading, seconded by Howard. Sisk offered a friendly amendment that no drive-through facilities are allowed. Keany offered a friendly amendment that there be no signage on the west or north faces of the buildings. Friendly amendments were accepted by Lathrop and Howard. Roll call was taken. Motion passed by a 6-1 vote, with Mayer voting against. RESOLUTION #19, SERIES 1999, FINAL PUD AND MINOR REPLAT FOR AMERICAN VARISEAL ON LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 1, THE PARK AT CTC Davidson called for staff presentation. Paul Wood, Planning Director, stated that this subject property includes Lot 3 and part of Lot 4, Block 1 of the Park at CTC. The applicant is American Variseal; a light manufacturing company currently located in Broomfield. They are proposing to construct a 55,535 square foot building on a 5.8-acre lot. Uses of the building would include office, light manufacturing and warehousing. A potential Phase II is shown on all site plan documents. However, no approval is being requested at this time for Phase II. The potential footprint for Phase II is shown only in that it relates to the Phase I location of other site improvements. The application also proposes to shift the lot line between Lots 3 and 4 approximately 90 feet to the east, increasing the size of Lot 3 by approximately 36,000 square feet. That request is being processed as a Minor Subdivision Replat, concurrent with the PUD review. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this application on December 8, 1998 and continued the application due to the number of outstanding issues related primarily to architecture. On January 12, 1999, the Commission held a second public hearing and a motion to approve the application failed by a vote of 5-2. The application therefore comes to City Council with a negative recommendation from the Planning Commission. Generally, the Commission's concern was with the use of metal siding on portions of the building. 30