Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2025 01 09

Metadata

Thumbnails

Annotations

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 12, 2024 Page 8 of 12 Joel Weikert, a non-resident and landscape architect with Ripley Design, introduced the presentation to the applicant. He explained the proposed design, providing background on the history of Coal Creek Village and the site context. Commissioner Questions of Applicant: Baskett asked whether the townhomes would have private backyards. Weikert responded that no, the space would mainly be taken up by the driveway. Brauneis asked if there was any data on the square footage of the units. Choi asked about the drainage for the site, given the large amounts of impermeable surfaces, and whether there was any consideration given to reducing some of the impermeable surface area, particularly because of the amount of parking space the project would require. Jason Markell, a civil engineer and non-resident, answered the question regarding parking. He explained that there would be parking in the townhomes at the grade level (two spots per townhome) and additional field parking. The design would include 24 extra parking spaces beyond what is required by code. Choi also asked about the process for snow removal, noting that the plans didn't seem to address this issue. Markell explained that they would typically have designated snow removal areas on the south side of the mixed -use area, which would take up a few parking spaces. Choi asked if this plan aligned with the overall grading plan, particularly in terms of snow melting off and water quality management. Markell responded that, as far as water quality was concerned, they had run the necessary calculations with the pocket park and were satisfied with their water quality management plan. Markell addressed Brauneis' question, explaining that the square footage for the units ranged as follows: approximately 900 sq. ft. for 2-bedroom units, 400-500 sq. ft. for 1- bedroom and studio apartments. For the townhomes, there would be a few different configurations, with sizes ranging from 1,200 sq. ft. to 1,600 sq. ft. The micro -town homes would range between 300 and 400 sq. ft. Markell also mentioned the success they had seen with small properties due to the ongoing housing crisis and the issue of affordability in Louisville. He explained some confusion regarding the 80% AMI (Area Median Income) Affordable housing units, noting that there was no need for a deed restriction because many of the properties fell below the amount of a deed -restricted property. Baskett asked about provisions for electric vehicle (EV) charging for the multi -unit buildings. Weikert responded that this would need to be further examined, especially given the evolving EV charging standards. Bangs asked about the impact of the pocket park on traffic flow, asking whether the private alley would essentially function as a road. City of Louisville Community Development 749 Main Street Louisville CO 80027 303.335.4592 www.LouisvilleCO.gov