My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1999 04 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1999 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1999 04 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:44 PM
Creation date
2/3/2004 10:50:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
4/20/1999
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1999 04 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Louisville for their evaluation, testing, and remediation efforts with the City's various <br />systems. However, he explained that the successful day-to-day operation for a <br />community the size of Louisville depends upon electrical power. He stated that forty-six <br />percent of the electric utilities do not expect to be Y2K ready by the industry's June target <br />date. The industry's analysis of its embedded systems has shown that the Y2K problem <br />places the nation's power supply at risk. He commended the Louisville Police Department <br />for their attempt at raising individual family awareness with their publication on Y2K <br />preparedness, and questioned why the emergency suggestions are being kept relatively <br />'under wraps.' He felt that the section on meeting with your neighbors and making <br />contingency plans together to deal with a possible Y2K emergency contained very <br />practical recommendations. He invited Council to attend their Y2K awareness events, use <br />due diligence to investigate the Y2K phenomena, and be more open and candid about the <br />need to strengthen the community through simple preparedness. He explained that they <br />are not a survivalist group or doomsday merchants, merely citizens who care about the <br />future of their community. <br /> <br />Jo Sherrill, 152 W Elm Street, Louisville, Colorado, explained that is also a member of <br />the Boulder County Y2K Preparedness Group and asked to discuss interconnectness. She <br />agreed that utilities are not secure. Public Service is testing, however, their March target <br />dates have been postponed to September. She stated that sixty-four percent of the health <br />care centers, primarily small hospitals, would not be ready. Transportation and other <br />industries have admitted they don't know where their embedded chips are or how to find <br />them. They are predicting a five-percent failure, which she believes will affect Louisville. <br />She commended the City for upgrading their computers but stated that there are many <br />things that are out of our control, She questioned what they could do if the transportation <br />industry was unable to provide fuel or food as they typically would. She admitted that the <br />power outages will probably be intermittent and suggested that Public Service Company <br />have alternative plans for such outages. She agreed that many people don't want to <br />discuss Y2K due to their fear of creating a panic. She does not believe that systems are as <br />ready as the public is being told. She feels that this community needs to take <br />responsibility to make sure their systems are ready. She urged Council to interface with <br />the community and support the efforts of the Boulder County Y2K Preparedness Group. <br />She requested that Council help distribute information to the community. <br /> <br />Mike Hamerly, 238 Harding Court, Louisville, explained that he has lived in Louisville <br />for seven years. He stated that many individuals find the art display at the Louisville <br />Recreation Center either morally offensive or that it serves to legitimize a particular <br />lifestyle. He asked for the City's policy on art displays and questioned the implications of <br />having a policy versus not having a policy. He stated that he and his wife met with Keith <br />Williams, Recreation Center Director, today, who explained that the Louisville Art <br />Association approved the display. Williams stated that the policy is that anything having <br />to do with art must be displayed on this particular wall because it is a public forum and <br />art is considered to be free speech. Hamerly stated that he does not disagree with that and <br />expressed concern that Williams is being forced into mediating a 'culture war.' Williams <br />also explained that there are exceptions to the display policy, i.e. if an art exhibit is <br />overtly pornographic or lewd or obscene, it can be turned down for display. Hamerly <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.