My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Recreation Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2025 04 28
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD
>
2025 Recreation Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Recreation Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2025 04 28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2025 10:02:50 AM
Creation date
4/24/2025 9:53:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
4/28/2025
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Quality Check
4/24/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Recreation Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />March 17, 2025 <br />Page 2of5 <br />Public Comments on Items not on the Agenda <br />Kathy explained that since conversion of the pickleball courts is not on the <br />agenda tonight, the RAB can only listen to public comments. Furthermore, this is <br />a matter that only the City Council can consider as a previously approved CIP. <br />This project has not gone out for public bid. <br />The following comments were heard and noted here in summary: <br />Kyle: please reconsider this conversion proposal as a lot of folks use the rink. <br />Jack: I have used the rink for the past several years as it's important for high <br />schoolers to improve our skills. <br />Owen: we should keep the rink. <br />Sue: I support pickleball. The inline rink is what is proposed to be converted, not <br />the skate park. I have not observed a lot of current use. <br />Helmit: as a neighbor, I can hear pickleball play on a daily basis and do not <br />support this conversion. <br />Mike: I think skaters and pickleball players can both use the rink. Why convert if <br />there are other places to play? I don't see the need. <br />Ryan: I oppose conversion for sole use for pickleball. I have taught many folks to <br />skate and there is sustained use. It should remain multi use. There are pickleball <br />courts elsewhere that are not fully used and new ones planned. I urge RAB to <br />ask City Council to pause this project. It should be done in tandem with building a <br />new rink before conversion occurs. <br />Alexis: Rink should remain multiuse for youth sports including hockey. Please <br />add this item to the next RAB meeting agenda. <br />Nate: I play hockey and oppose conversion of this rink. I want to continue to play. <br />Wes: I have used the rink with my bike, for skating and it keeps youth physically <br />active. It's convenient as I don't need a ride to use it. Often pickleball players are <br />older and can drive themselves. <br />Mike: My kids and their friends use the rink for hockey. It's a unique facility that is <br />safe for families to use. It is underutilized and the City can do better to promote <br />its use. I understand that pickleball players want to use it but unlike hockey, <br />these folks can play elsewhere. The RAB should ask City Council to reconsider. <br />Rachel: the rink should remain multiuse. Inline hockey facilities are limited. <br />Tamar: my son learned to unicycle on this rink. Please tell City Council to keep <br />the rink multiuse. Please also stay for the Comp Plan's three different scenarios <br />regarding increased housing on tonight's agenda. <br />Stella: Our family has used the rink for several years and should remain multiuse. <br />Please let City Council know of our concerns. <br />Kaylin: I learned how to skateboard on the rink to relieve stress after school. It <br />should remain multiuse. Otherwise, skating is expensive to do elsewhere. The <br />rink allows us to skate for free. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.