My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1999 06 15
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1999 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1999 06 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:44 PM
Creation date
2/3/2004 1:20:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
6/15/1999
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1999 06 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Odor: The odor issue is being addressed by relocating the location where compost, <br />organic mulch and landscape waste are stored. Those are all now located on the far <br />south end of the site to avoid conflicts with the residences to the north of G.E. <br />Enterprises <br /> <br />Staff attended the neighborhood meeting and felt that these solutions addressed the <br />neighborhood concerns. No members of the public came to the May 25 Commission <br />hearing to speak either for or against the application. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission held a second hearing on May 25 and unanimously approved <br />the application with the three conditions, which the applicant has since addressed. <br /> <br />Johnstone explained that this application has not been processed as a Final PUD <br />Development Plan. Staff determined that no PUD was required because no permanent <br />development of the property was proposed, and request that the plan sheets be revised to <br />eliminate reference to Final PUD. <br /> <br />Davidson called for the applicant presentation. <br /> <br />David Gray, President of G.E. Enterprises, 1315 Cannon Street, explained that they have <br />been at their current location for fourteen years. He stated that he agrees with <br />recommendations from staff and the Planning Commission. He was then available to <br />answer any questions. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Council comments and questions. <br /> <br />Mayer asked Johnstone to define what constitutes permanent development. <br /> <br />Johnstone replied that this is basically stockpiling of merchandise, which does not require <br />any physical improvements to the property such as curb and gutter or asphalt. He <br />explained that the trailer is a mobile trailer; however, it will need to meet building code <br />requirements. He admitted that the trailer is permanent in one sense in that it will be fixed <br />to the ground but it is designed to be mobile. <br /> <br />Mayer expressed concern that this could potentially be a 'loop hole' whereby a business <br />could place wheels under something and would not be subject to PUD development <br />plans. <br /> <br />Sisk asked Tom Phare, Public Works Director, how to minimize the dust in this area. <br /> <br />Phare replied that the City could increase the frequency of applying magnesium chloride <br />or, as opportunity provides, use some of the ground asphalt produced by the street <br />replacement program to cover the road. <br /> <br />Sisk stated that it is important that the truck traffic is directed to use Hwy 42 to reach the <br />business and not Main Street. <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.