My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1999 07 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1999 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1999 07 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:45 PM
Creation date
2/3/2004 1:49:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
7/6/1999
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1999 07 06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Boulder and Coal Creek, .45 shares of South Boulder and Coal Creek First <br />Extension, and 1.7 shares of Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company, or Marshall <br />Lake. The City of Louisville now owns those. Boulder County has suggested that the sale <br />agreement contain the same language used for the water on the east parcel. Specifically, <br />that the water rights would be continued to be owned by the City. If, in the future, the <br />City would wish to convey a transfer or remove the water rights from agricultural use on <br />the property, that the City could provide a substitute supply of water in the equivalent <br />yield amount. He stated that if the City were going to do that, the County would be <br />notified and they would have a right to object. He explained that this agreement is the <br />same for the east parcel. He stated that staff has reviewed other possible substitute water <br />supplies but has not been able to locate water which can make its way to the parcel and <br />be used for that. There are seven to eight acres that the water rights represent. He <br />requested Council's consent to change the original sale agreement to include a provision <br />in the Admor west document that would put the water shares on the property with the <br />City retaining ownership and the ability to find a substitute water supply for the water <br />rights. <br /> <br />Davidson asked for the value of the water rights. <br /> <br />Simmons replied that he is unable to calculate the value at this time. <br /> <br />Davidson stated that this wasn't part of the original deal when the City was negotiating to <br />sell the land to a private landowner, as the City was not going to sell the water rights. He <br />explained that in the original deal, Boulder County was going to pay the City half of what <br />the private landowner was going to pay. <br /> <br />Lathrop asked whether water from the Goodhue Ditch could be delivered to the property. <br /> <br />Simmons replied, no, and explained that Goodhue is below the elevation of the parcel. It <br />would require modifying the ditch or pumping water from the ditch. <br /> <br />Mayer asked if the equivalent amount of water has been defined. <br /> <br />Simmons replied equivalent would be measured in acre-feet and the amount of acre-feet <br />that is available that can be applied to the property. He explained that a typical rule of <br />thumb that has been used is two acre-feet of water per acre, however, this doesn't come <br />near that amount. <br /> <br />Mayer stated that he felt that these are pretty high-quality water rights. <br /> <br />Davidson asked Simmons whom, specifically, at Boulder County asked for the water <br />rights. <br /> <br />Simmons replied Commissioner Ron Stewart. <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.