My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1999 08 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1999 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1999 08 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:45 PM
Creation date
2/3/2004 2:15:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
8/3/1999
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1999 08 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
staff have been incorporated into the project and the renderings have not yet been amended <br />to reflect this. He was then available to answer any questions. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Council comments and questions. <br /> <br />Sisk expressed support for the appearance of the facility. He explained that, however, he <br />was frustrated with the maneuvers of the US Postal Service. He asked Ballard how far along <br />they were with the building before it was presented to Council. <br /> <br />Ballard replied that it was approximately twenty to thirty-percent complete prior to any <br />direct contact with Paul Wood, Planning Director. <br /> <br />Sisk asked whether this was typical of the way the US Postal Service treats municipalities. <br /> <br />Ballard replied they did have superficial contact with the City. As well, they did contact the <br />Public Works Department on the more technical, utilitarian entities. He admitted that they <br />are in the process of trying to change their ways. He explained that, in the past, this is typical <br />of the way the US Postal Service treats municipalities. <br /> <br />Sisk stated that while he was in Washington, D.C. in May, he expressed his dismay to <br />Senator Ben Campbell about the way that the US Postal Service treated Louisville. He asked <br />Wood why the US Postal Service would be treated differently by the Commercial <br />Development Design Standards & Guidelines, specifically in regards to landscaping <br />requirements. He questioned whether Kohl's or Sam's Club would be required to provide <br />thirty-percent open space. <br /> <br />Wood replied, yes. He stated that he did share a copy of the Commercial Development <br />Design Standards & Guidelines with Mr. Ballard and also pointed out this deficiency to the <br />Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Sisk expressed concern that the lighting is almost three times the lighting that was allowed at <br />Sam's Club and Kohl's. <br /> <br />Wood replied that there has been a reduction in the overall lighting levels since they were <br />initially brought forward. He stated that the lighting levels on the east end aren't down to <br />zero, but they are less than .5. He explained that staff's concern is with the direct visual <br />contact of the lighting fixtures in the canopy. <br /> <br />Sisk asked whether the lighting levels on the east side would be comparable to the lighting <br />from Kohl's and Sam's Club. <br /> <br />Wood replied, no, it's higher. <br /> <br />Sisk asked whether the City has received any complaints from the neighbors along Dahlia <br />behind Kohl's and Sam's Club. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.