City Council Minutes 1999 09 07 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

an element of atmosphere in the evening. He introduced members of RNL Design, who presented computer-generated renderings of the exterior of the restaurant, including the architectural element. He stated that after re-measuring the facility, the customer guest counts have been reduced by approximately fifty guests. He presented a computer- generated rendering of the building's appearance at night. He explained that the architectural element would assist diners in locating the facility. Steve Walsh, RNL Design, 915 King Street, Boulder, Colorado, explained that Bill Simmons requested that Todd provide some examples of architectural elements, such as the tower, within the City of Louisville. He presented copies of photos from the History of Louisville by Caroline Connaroe, that contain mine shafts resembling the architectural element. He explained that the tower attempts to be a part of the mining history in Louisville. Sisk called for public comments. Erik Hartronft, 801 Main Street, Louisville, explained that he has followed this project and commended the applicant for the intriguing design and quality of the project. He agreed that the Commercial Development Design Standards & Guidelines do not promote creativity, only uniformity. He stated that the applicant has provided an exceptional design, in addition to high quality elements. He felt that creative buildings enhance the landscape and environment. He stated that it is the buildings that create the environment of Louisville. He encouraged Council to approve the building. Sisk called for Council comments and questions. Lathrop stated that he was initially opposed to the design, specifically with the height. He stated that the modifications that have been made would result in a shorter, narrower building and he felt that the tower element provided proportion to the project. He agreed with Hartronft regarding the high quality of the building and commended Schneider for taking a risk with this building. He expressed support for the tower. Mayer agreed with Lathrop and Hartronft that the PUD process allows flexibility in order to result in a better product. He commended the applicant for the building design. He asked Wood to clarify parking requirements; specifically whether the requirements were based strictly upon square footage. Wood replied that the Commercial Development Design Standards & Guidelines call for 15 spaces per 1,000 sf, which is the ratio that was used for Chili' s, and Ruby Tuesdays, or for any free-standing restaurant. Mayer asked for the width of Arthur Avenue. Phare replied that Arthur Avenue is at least forty-two feet wide, and could possibly be forty-six feet wide. 16