My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2011 03 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2011 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2011 03 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:49:45 AM
Creation date
5/31/2011 2:33:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2011 03 10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Pritchard moved and Sheets seconded a motion to adopt the proposed Planning <br />Commission Bylaws as presented. Motion passed by voice vote. <br />Regular Business — Continuation <br />ConocoPhillips — A request to consider extending the expiration date for 2270 <br />South 88 Street (ConocoPhillips) for one (1) year for a previously approved <br />preliminary plat and preliminary planned unit development (PUD). Staff and <br />applicant are requesting a continuance to the March 10, 2011 Planning <br />Commission public hearing. <br />. Case Manager: Troy Russ Director of Planning & Building Safety <br />Russ stated the City and ConocoPhillips have been in • - rsation since <br />December, 2010 regarding the extension of the expir • for their project. It had <br />been agreed to have the request heard at the Feb eeting, however, <br />the key presenters from ConocoPhillips had so - Wings c• - up and are <br />unable to attend this evening, therefore, the r- • -st to contin - is business <br />item to the March 10, 2011 Planning Com on Meeting. <br />Lipton moved and Loo seconded a moti• continu- requeste•.`•tion <br />passed by unanimous voice vote. <br />Discussion / Direction — Old T® Overlay: • • Pitch Requirements: <br />McMillan led the discussion by • sower p• •resentation. His points of <br />discussion included the following: <br />• What is roof pitch <br />• Current • ent o . • • - t• • own Overlay Zone District <br />• Many - • . no • nform ® ructures with regards to roof pitch <br />re <br />He c <br />ded by <br />rovide clarit <br />ress legal n° <br />oo the right <br />ers br. <br />2) <br />3) 1 <br />The Commi <br />discussion sta <br />Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 13, 2011 <br />Page 7 of 8 <br />ect number to achieve the intent <br />street view of the home <br />uld dif e • ®- rcentage requirements have <br />e three issues regarding roof pitch standards: <br />finition <br />onfo M g structures <br />ber? <br />discussed and suggested an open forum to get the <br />community. <br />Planning Commi • n Comments <br />Russell stated a study session with City Council regarding the medical marijuana <br />topic might have helped to guide the discussion by the Commission. <br />O'Connell stated she liked the Table of Contents provided with the new format of <br />the packet. <br />Staff Comments <br />1) Administrative SRU Approval — 917 Front Street, Suite 260 <br />2) Grain Elevator — update <br />Page 9 of 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.