Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />FEBRUARY 8, 2007 <br />Page 7 of 9 <br /> <br />Staff recommends approval of the amendment to the LMC pertaining to the review of <br />preliminary subdivision plats and preliminary PUD development plans by the Louisville <br />Planning Commission and Louisville City Council. <br /> <br />Questions of Staff: <br />Deborski inquired about additional cost to the applicant. <br /> <br />McCartney replied the only additional cost would be extra time. He also said it could save the <br />applicant money because producing a final with more detail would be costly if the project were <br />denied or drastically changed. <br /> <br />Sheets asked what advantage the additional review had for the applicant. <br /> <br />McCartney stated it would give additional feedback and direction. <br /> <br />Sheets asked if the City Attorney had reviewed the Ordinance. <br /> <br />Wood stated the City Attorney had drafted the ordinance. <br /> <br />Members of the Public: <br />Rick Brew stated he had listened to the joint study session and the support for the ordinance <br />change would give developers the feedback they need before proceeding too far into a project <br />only to find out it has no support from City Council without major changes. <br /> <br />Public Hearing Closed / Commission Comments: <br />Sheets passed wanting to hear other Commission comments. <br /> <br />Hartman stated her support for the ordinance. <br /> <br />Deborski stated he had anticipated the review to be voluntary and not mandatory. He expressed <br />concern it would slow-down the project. <br /> <br />Pritchard stated the review should be optional. <br /> <br />Lipton stated he supports the ordinance as written. <br /> <br />Loo stated the review should be voluntary <br /> <br />Roll Call Vote: <br />Dalton moved and Loo seconded a motion to approve Resolution No.5, Series 2007 as presented <br />by Staff. <br /> <br />Pritchard offered a substitute motion for the review to be optional at the request of the applicant. <br /> <br />Deborski seconded the motion. <br /> <br />Lipton stated he did not favor the substitute motion. <br /> <br />Deborski stated he supports the substitute motion. <br /> <br />Hartman stated she agrees with Lipton. <br /> <br />Lipton called the question. <br /> <br />Name Vote - substitute motion <br />Jeff Lipton No <br />Chris Pritchard Yes <br />Susan S. Loo No <br />