Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council <br />Study Session Summary <br />March 13, 2007 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />David Hosansky spoke about the usage of the current arts center and their desire to <br />enlarge the site. He noted their estimates for an expansion that would add 1000 square <br />feet to the west of the building would cost approximately $350,000 - $500,000. <br /> <br />Don Atwood spoke regarding the economic benefits of the arts in the metro area. He <br />noted a new arts center could be a boost to Louisville's economy. The Cultural Council <br />plans to create a subcommittee to generate private funding for the facility. <br /> <br />Brown asked what the Cultural Council needed from the City for this project. Atwood <br />stated they needed meeting space at the Recreation Center. Atwood added that he and <br />Keith Williams had an understanding that project would only be allocated a very limited <br />amount of City staff time. <br /> <br />Muckle asked about the possibility of having a joint use agreement for a performing arts <br />site at the renovated Louisville Middle School. Cultural Council member thought it could <br />work if there was a specific agreement on how the time would be divided with the school. <br /> <br />Phillips noted their interest in perhaps having a new arts facility in the Urban Renewal <br />Area. Brown told her to contact the Revitalization Commission and discuss their <br />thoughts with that group. <br /> <br />Discussion of Trailer Storage Regulations and Public Process <br /> <br />Wood gave a short report on where the current ordinance repeal is and what the next <br />steps are. He also discussed how some of the neighboring communities address this <br />issue. <br /> <br />Wood noted that some of the criteria that are being considered for a new ordinance are: <br />. Define the type of units that would be acceptable <br />. Number of units <br />. Required separation of parking from right-of-way <br />. Requirement for screening of vehicle <br />. Requirement that parking on residential lot be limited to the owner or tenant of <br />the property <br />. Requirement that vehicle have current registration and license plates <br />. Restriction that vehicles over 32 feet not be on residential lots <br /> <br />Wood noted staff was attempting to create clear criteria for Code Enforcement to <br />interpret. <br /> <br />Members of the public asked for clarification on what exactly and when the next steps <br />would be: <br />. April 12, Planning Commission continues hearing on repeal of existing ordinance <br />. May 1, City Council has second reading on repeal of existing ordinance <br />. Late May, public meeting to discuss proposed new ordinance <br />