My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Impact Fee Liaison Committee Agenda and Packet 2011 06 20
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
IMPACT FEE LIAISON COMMITTEE
>
2011 Impact Fee Liaison Committe Agendas and Packets
>
Impact Fee Liaison Committee Agenda and Packet 2011 06 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:19:37 PM
Creation date
7/8/2011 8:38:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
IFLCPKT 2011 06 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
improvements that have been included in the impact fee calculations. Project improvements normally <br />required as part of the development approval process are not eligible for credits against impact fees. <br />RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEES BY NUMBER OF BEDROOMS <br />Impact fees are often assessed as a flat fee per housing unit, regardless of size or numbers of bedrooms. <br />While legally defensible, the "one fee fits all" structure of this type of schedule can be regressive in <br />nature as smaller homes and apartments pay disproportionately larger share of costs, while larger <br />homes pay disproportionately smaller shares. <br />One of the fundamental requirements of impact fees is the concept of proportionate share. <br />Proportionate share is the principle that impact fee amounts must correspond with the demand and <br />cost for additional infrastructure capacity. This relationship is the critical difference which distinguishes <br />impact fees from taxes. Smaller homes and apartments often have smaller household sizes compared <br />to larger ones. These differences have a direct relationship on the need for additional infrastructure <br />capacity resulting in differences in impact fee amounts. Impact fees based on number of bedrooms or <br />size of units more accurately reflect actual proportionate demand for additional infrastructure capacity. <br />To better reflect the proportionate demand for additional infrastructure capacity created by different <br />types of residential land uses, TischlerBise has calculated residential impact fees by types of housing <br />units by number of bedrooms. <br />PROPOSED IMPACT FEES <br />The figure below lists the proposed impact fee amounts. In order to provide a basis for comparison, the <br />City's current impact fees are shown at the far right of the figure along with the dollar change between <br />the proposed and current fees. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.