Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 13, 2011 <br />Page 7 of 8 <br /> <br />Pritchard moved and Sheets seconded a motion to adopt the proposed Planning <br />Commission Bylaws as presented. Motion passed by voice vote. <br />Regular Business – Continuation <br />ConocoPhillips – A request to consider extending the expiration date for 2270 <br />th <br />South 88 Street (ConocoPhillips) for one (1) year for a previously approved <br />preliminary plat and preliminary planned unit development (PUD). Staff and <br />applicant are requesting a continuance to the March 10, 2011 Planning <br />Commission public hearing. <br /> <br /> Case Manager: Troy Russ Director of Planning & Building Safety <br />Russ stated the City and ConocoPhillips have been in conversation since <br />December, 2010 regarding the extension of the expiration for their project. It had <br />th <br />been agreed to have the request heard at the February 10 meeting, however, <br />the key presenters from ConocoPhillips had some things come up and are <br />unable to attend this evening, therefore, the request to continue this business <br />item to the March 10, 2011 Planning Commission Meeting. <br />Lipton moved and Loo seconded a motion to continue as requested. Motion <br />passed by unanimous voice vote. <br />Discussion / Direction – Old Town Overlay: Roof Pitch Requirements: <br />McMillan led the discussion by utilizing a power point presentation. His points of <br />discussion included the following: <br />What is roof pitch <br /> <br /> <br />Current requirement only applies to Old Town Overlay Zone District <br /> <br /> <br />Many legal non-conforming structures with regards to roof pitch <br /> <br /> <br />requirements <br />What percentage of roof is correct number to achieve the intent <br /> <br /> <br />How does requirement affect the street view of the home <br /> <br /> <br />What effect would different percentage requirements have <br /> <br /> <br />He concluded by reviewing the three issues regarding roof pitch standards: <br />1) Provide clarity with the definition <br />2) Address legal nonconforming structures <br />3) Is 80% the right number? <br />The Commissioners briefly discussed and suggested an open forum to get the <br />discussion started in the community. <br />Planning Commission Comments <br />Russell stated a study session with City Council regarding the medical marijuana <br />topic might have helped to guide the discussion by the Commission. <br />O’Connell stated she liked the Table of Contents provided with the new format of <br />the packet. <br />Staff Comments <br />1) Administrative SRU Approval – 917 Front Street, Suite 260 <br />2) Grain Elevator – update <br /> <br /> <br />