My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1999 12 21
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1999 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1999 12 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:45 PM
Creation date
2/4/2004 11:03:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
12/21/1999
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1999 12 21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Howard explained that the absolute raw costs are going up about 40-50% and the City is <br />passing along half of that increase. In addition, other fees are being reduced. If these <br />numbers are correct, anyone developing in the Colorado Tech Center would be at a <br />break-even point in 3 V2 to four years. In order for the City of Louisville to continue <br />financially strong, growth should continue to pay its way. He expressed support for the <br />increase in light of the fact that the City is only passing along half of the increase. <br /> <br />Davidson explained that a water tap fee pays for its proportional share of the water <br />treatment plant in addition to the cost to purchase water rights to provide water for that <br />tap. A water user coming on board, although paying the going rate for acquiring a water <br />share, is actually receiving the pipeline and water treatment plant at ten-year old prices. <br /> <br />Keany asked for clarification that the Mayor's suggestion is to increase the water tap fee <br />from $11,400 to $13,400. <br /> <br />Davidson agreed. He stated that the other tap fees would increase proportionally. <br /> <br />Keany agreed with Lathrop that Louisville is losing development to surrounding cities <br />that offer the incentive of lower tap fees. <br /> <br />Davidson asked who should be charged if the water tap user is not charged. He explained <br />that the City of Louisville has, historically, been on the high end. The City purchases a <br />more reliable source of water which is, therefore, more expensive. <br /> <br />Lathrop agreed that Colorado Big Thompson water rights could reach the $10,000 per <br />share range. He wondered if Council would consider lowering the tap fees in the future, <br />should the cost of water decrease. He stated that Council is anticipating an increase and <br />questioned whether Council would react if the market went the other way, leaving the <br />City on the high end of the market. <br /> <br />Davidson replied that if the costs decrease, the City should lower the tap fee. He <br />explained that construction costs and the cost to purchase raw water have not gone down <br />since he has been on Council. <br /> <br /> Mayer expressed concern that the fee listed for the City of Boulder is misleading. He <br /> explained that the amounts listed may be the formal water tap and sewer tap fees, <br /> however, the City of Boulder distributes costs across several different fee categories and <br /> some of the costs are listed as development excise fees. He stated that when the City of <br />· Louisville first considered building a pipeline in 1992, the estimated cost for Colorado <br /> Big Thompson water rights was $1,600. He explained that this amount has quadrupled <br /> since then and he did not believe that there would be a reduction in the cost of raw water <br /> with demands from the increasing growth in the metro area. He stated that the reason the <br /> City of Louisville has been able to lower fees to the residents is because the City has been <br /> paying off its debt by making growth pay its own way. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.