City Council Minutes 2011 08 02 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Council Meeting Minutes August 2, 2011 Page 7 of 12 there was discussion about the views or sight lines from the Sports Complex to the North and Highway 42 to the South. He favored relaxing the no -build line to allow development. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilors voiced their support for Option #3 Modifying the annexation agreement to include a Tess restrictive no -build line. There was some concern expressed for building in the narrowest portion of the lot, which would obstruct the sight lines. Councilors inquired whether Mr. Lutz intended any other uses for the area. Mr. Lutz envisioned some outside seating for patrons and an agricultural growing area in the proximity of the roadway. Councilors expressed support for moving the no -build line by 150 Feet. PUBLIC COMMENTS Michael Menaker, 1826 Choke Cherry Drive, Louisville suggested a lot restriction for surface parking. Mr. Lutz felt a restriction on surface parking was reasonable. City Attorney Light suggested Staff return with exact language and an amendment to the Annexation Agreement. There was Council consensus. APPROVE AN AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF LOUISVILLE AND HATCH MOTT MACDONALD, LLC FOR CONSULTING SERVICES Mayor Pro Tem Marsella requested a staff presentation. Public Works Director Phare explained the Public Works Division is seeking Council approval of an Agreement for a facilities plan. Several large capital expenditures are expected in the Utility Enterprise in the future and a facilities plan would integrate system capacity, water resources, operation, maintenance, emergency response and regulations within the context of existing and projected future demand scenarios. The plan will provide a `road map' to assist in the prioritization, scheduling and funding of capital projects within the water system between now and expected build -out. The work will also review the adequacy of the existing facilities and infrastructure due to design and regulatory changes since their construction. The project will consist of five major tasks: public outreach, reviewing existing data and facilities, evaluation of proposed CIP projects, creation of a need and scheduling decision tree, and a final report discussing project methodology, findings and recommendations. The City requested Statements of Qualifications detailing a firm's qualifications and interest in the project. This information was evaluated and four firms were invited to submit proposals for the project. Upon review of the proposals three firms were interviewed. Based on the company's understanding of the project, firm capabilities,