My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2007 01 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2007 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2007 01 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:41:48 PM
Creation date
7/31/2007 9:34:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
1/2/2007
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2007 01 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 2, 2007 <br />Page 5 of 10 <br /> <br />Council member Muckle explained the expressed intent of the resolution requires <br />the Council to examine certain issues and make decisions on sales tax <br />increments and property tax for the urban renewal district, which would not <br />require voter approval. He stated Section 3 does not require a plan be <br />developed within one year, but to prioritize projects during the comprehensive <br />plan review process. He statE~d the resolution is not all about voter approval and <br />he was willing to consider removing Section 1 in recognition that an election <br />could not be held for two years. <br /> <br />City Attorney Light stated SeGtion 1 of the resolution does not legally bind future <br />Councils from exercising their authority. He noted in Section 4, the City has the <br />right to issue revenue bonds, with voter's approval, however an urban renewal <br />authority does not require voter's approval on tax increments revenue bonds. He <br />addressed Section 7, regarding RTD, and stated it did not create a legal <br />obligation for the City or the urban renewal authority to provide funding to <br />mitigate the impacts of the RTD project. <br /> <br />Council member Marsella noted the resolution states the City will work with RTD <br />to mitigate the impacts. She felt the statement was more than an expectation. <br /> <br />Council member Muckle statE~d the resolution does not state the City will spend <br />funds to mitigate RTD projects on the citizens or local businesses. He stated <br />Section 6 and 7 are responses to citizens concerns on the urban renewal plan. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Brown stated the resolution gives a blanket statement of intent <br />and noted Section 3 requires a plan within one year. <br /> <br />MOTION: Council member Muckle moved to approve Resolution No. 59, Series <br />2006, seconded by Council member Yarnell. Roll call vote was taken. The <br />motion failed by a vote of 5-2. Council members Muckle and Yarnell voted yes. <br /> <br />ORDINANCE No. 1507, SERIES 2007 - AN ORDINANCE ENACTING A NEW <br />CHAPTER 3.24 OF THE LOUISVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH AN <br />ENHANCED SALES/USE: TAX INCENTIVE PROGRAM AS A BUSINESS <br />ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OF THE CITY _1st reading - set public hearing <br />1/16/07 <br />Mayor Sisk requested a City Attorney introduction. <br /> <br />City Attorney Light read Ordinance No. 1507, Series 2007, and reviewed the <br />red line revisions to the ordinance. <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk requested a BRaD committee presentation. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Brown explained the ordinance provides the Council and City <br />Staff the tools to move forward with business retention and development. He <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.