My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2011 09 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2011 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2011 09 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:49:45 AM
Creation date
10/17/2011 10:07:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2011 09 08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 11, 2011 <br />Page 3 of 9 <br />package for the placement of a monument/directional sign on Lot 1, Block 1 of <br />Centennial Business Park Subdivision with no conditions. <br />Commission Questions of Staff: <br />Russell discussed the poor parking lot circulation and site vision clearance with <br />staff. <br />McCartney acknowledged staff is aware of the poor parking lot circulation, but <br />added the sign would not be a vision clearance hazard. <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Scott Yeates, Koebel and Company, reviewed the access to the west side of the <br />building. He stated the center is fully leased. He noted the requested sign is a <br />duplication of type, style, etc to the original monument sign for the center. <br />Commission questions of Applicant: <br />Lipton asked if the center needed way-finding signage. <br />Yeates stated he believes the additional monument sign will take care of the <br />problem. <br />Loo and Yeates discussed the proposed wording for the new sign. <br />Yeates stated the tenants do not like to use the words ‘rear’ or ‘back’. <br />Loo asked staff if the applicant has the flexibility to change the wording. <br />McCartney stated the text could be changed but the size and materials cannot be <br />changed. <br />Public Comment: <br />None heard. <br />Summary Comments and Request from Staff and/or Applicant: <br />No additional comments from either staff or the applicant. <br />Closed Public Hearing – Planning Commission Discussion: <br />All of the commissioner stated their support. <br />Russell moved and Sheets seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 17, <br />Series 2011 a resolution recommending approval of a request to amend the <br />previously approved planned unit development (PUD) plan sign package for the <br />placement of a monument/directional sign on Lot 1, Block 1 of the Centennial <br />Business Park Subdivision. <br />Roll Call Vote: <br />NameVote <br />Jeff Lipton Yes <br />Chris Pritchard Yes <br />Susan S. LooYes <br />Ann O’Connell Excused <br />Monica SheetsYes <br />Steve Brauneis Yes <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.