Laserfiche WebLink
PAGE TWO <br />SUBJECT: DISCUSSION /DIRECTION - 2012 PROPOSED BUDGET <br />DATE: OCTOBER 11, 2011 <br />At this time the procurement process is undetermined. The facility could be done <br />through a design build or design, bid, build. It is thought the overall schedule for these <br />activities related to initiating construction of the Shops will take 9 to 12 months. It is also <br />noted the project is currently being handled by a management team. No one staff <br />member has the time to devote full -time efforts to this project (CIP Manager O). This <br />has, and will, result in a more extended project timeline. <br />9) Justification for the additional FTEs(Full Time Equivalent) /hours for Police Officer, 40- <br />hour Permit Tech position to replace 20- hour Administrative Assistant position, <br />additional 11 hours for the Museum Coordinator, a 32 -hour Head Lifeguard position <br />(benefited), which is currently funded by Temporary Part -time allocations with no <br />benefits and a Full -time CIP Manager. Justifications are provided below. <br />Police Officer - In each of the years, 2009 and 2010, the Police Department was reduced one <br />FTE police officer due to decreased municipal revenues and projected General Fund deficits. <br />The elimination of the FTEs resulted from employee attrition, not from lay -offs. For both <br />positions, the Police Department volunteered the reduction in staff in the spirit of cooperative <br />budget balancing, and we discussed without guarantees the expectation that both positions <br />would be reinstated when the City could again add FTEs. <br />Each police officer meant the loss of 40 patrol hours per week. Before the reductions, the City <br />had a lean force, but had some capacity to absorb staffing fluctuations caused by vacations, <br />on -duty injuries, extended FMLA, court, training, etc. When personnel are absent for any <br />reason, the decrease of 80 patrol hours per week has meant there is little ability to attain <br />minimum staffing levels without reassignments, overtime, early call -ins and holding officers <br />over after end of shift. Currently, the Police Department has two officers working part time in <br />non - enforcement duties due to injuries. These types of unavoidable staffing reductions are not <br />exceptional. <br />The Police Department's biggest public safety concern is for the schools, but because of tight <br />scheduling, the three school resource officers are spending less time in the schools because <br />they are handling every day calls for service. The Police Department feels strongly that <br />ultimately reinstating more than one FTE is critical, and that the City should have a plan to <br />bring the department back to full strength, ultimately increasing the number of officers by an <br />additional FTE (in addition to the one proposed in 2012) in the near future. A table is attached <br />that compares Louisville's police staffing to Boulder County municipalities and other Colorado <br />cities of similar populations (Attachment D). <br />Permit Tech Position at 40 hours replacing 20 -hour Administrative Assistant Position — <br />Due to the increase in workload and an anticipated sustained higher building activity, staff is <br />recommending City Council approve a 2012 budget request for the Planning and Building <br />Safety Department to fund a full -time benefited Permit Technician position that would replace <br />the current vacant part-time (20 -hour) Administrative Assistant position. <br />3 <br />