My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2011 09 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2011 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2011 09 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:31 PM
Creation date
12/5/2011 10:19:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
9/6/2011
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2011 09 06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> September 6, 2011 <br /> • Page 4 of 12 <br /> funding for existing and future historic landmarked residential and commercial structures <br /> between now and the sunset of the HPF tax in 2019. <br /> To date, twelve residential structures and one commercial structure façade (the Rex <br /> Theater) have received landmark status or a conservation easement. That leaves 537 <br /> additional structures, both residential and commercial eligible to become historic <br /> landmarks. Over the next ten years, an additional 24 structures will become eligible for <br /> landmark status. Staff assumed a total of 64 residential (eight annually) and 4 <br /> commercial structures, with the proposed commercial incentives, will apply for landmark <br /> status, resulting in a potential total of 68 landmarked structures by 2019. <br /> Staff projected the HPF will receive approximately $375,000 annually from Sales Tax, <br /> State Grant, and miscellaneous funds through 2019 when the tax will sunset. Currently <br /> about 12% of the fund is allocated for administrative costs, including staff time to <br /> complete reviews of the historical significance of buildings proposed for landmarking <br /> and 6.5% allocated for professional services. <br /> Based on current demand and identified resources, staff recommended guideline 60% <br /> of the grant funding be reserved for residential structures and 40% be reserved for <br /> commercial structures. If 60% of the projected $2.4 million grant funding is allocated to <br /> residential structures, a total of about $1.4 million would be available for residential <br /> • properties over the next 8 years. This amount would permit: A signing bonus of $1,000, <br /> plus up to a $5,000 incentive grant for general maintenance and up to $16,500 grant <br /> amount for restoration and preservation. In one scenario, costs above the residential <br /> grant cap would be an out-of- pocket expense for the property owner. Allocating 40% of <br /> the HPF to commercial uses would result in about $976,000 for that purpose over the <br /> next eight year period. <br /> The recently completed Historic Structure Assessment (HSA) for the Grain Elevator <br /> indicated it would take just over$680,000 to clean up and make it structurally sound to <br /> remain in place. If 40% of the projected HPF funds are allocated to commercial uses, <br /> and if $685,000 is devoted to the Grain Elevator project, it would leave $291,000 for <br /> other commercial structures. This would be enough to provide $72,750 each for four <br /> different commercial properties. <br /> The HPC has scheduled a special meeting on September 12th to discuss the future of <br /> the grant program and corresponding fiscal management guidelines. One item of <br /> interest is to create a priority list of projects to focus the funding on projects the HPC <br /> would like to preserve. Staff recommended the HPC consider establishing a <br /> preservation master plan and corresponding fiscal management guidelines to create a <br /> priority list of where the preservation funds should be allocated and annually re- <br /> evaluated. This would be done so as to re-allocate the fiscal resources of the fund <br /> dedicated for residential and commercial landmarks based on the number of landmarks <br /> received the year before. <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.