My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2000 02 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2000 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2000 02 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:45 PM
Creation date
1/30/2004 10:33:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
2/1/2000
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2000 02 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
under the Code, users have not been charged for any increase excepted under the Code, <br />and have not been charged for any increase in the size of the tap. <br /> <br />Davidson asked if them were safety issues in the Uniform Code that were resolved in the <br />International Code. <br /> <br />Talboom stated that the International Code is not mom restrictive. <br /> <br />Davidson asked, with respect to Section 15.016.020 Plumbing Permit Fees, if that refers <br />to a fee table. <br /> <br />Talboom stated that it is the same fee schedule currently used now. He also noted that the <br />Ordinance does not increase any permit fees or tap fees. <br /> <br />Davidson asked if the preponderance of the evidence for the metropolitan area cities is <br />the preference of the International Plumbing Code over the Uniform Plumbing Code. <br /> <br />Talboom stated that the majority of the Metropolitan Cities currently use the Uniform <br />Plumbing Code, but are waiting for the full family of Codes to consider and adopt at one <br />time. <br /> <br />Keany commented that in Section 4, regarding time clocks, the word "shall" should be <br />changed to "may". His preference was the recommendation of the wording time clock <br />"may" be installed, rather "shall" be installed. <br /> <br />Keany voiced his concern that Louisville would adopt and implement a code that very <br />few communities have adopted. <br /> <br />Talboom stated that Colorado is unique because most States are going with the <br />International Codes. He noted that a lot of jurisdictions are waiting for the full family of <br />codes to consider and adopt them all at once. <br /> <br />Mayer asked if the plumbing permit fees schedules are set by the City or in compliance <br />with the Codes. <br /> <br />Talboom stated the fees contained in the Uniform Plumbing Code have not been changed <br />in the International Plumbing Code. When the City adopted the Codes, they adopt the <br />fees. <br /> <br />Sisk suggested that Mr. Pierce respond to Chief Building Official Talboom' s comments <br />to the Council questions. <br /> <br />Mr. Pierce stated that he did not feel that the Chief Building Official had directly <br />responded to Council's questions.. Mr. Pierce stated that over forty states have adopted <br />the Uniform Plumbing Code. With regard to safety issues, Mr. Pierce stated that the <br />International Plumbing Codes permits Studor Air Admittance Valves, which is not <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.