Laserfiche WebLink
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND: <br />Information provided by historian Bridget Bacon <br />The house was built in 1932 as a single family residence. There were 3 primary <br />families who owned this residence from 1932 to 1999: John and Katie Porta, Pasqual <br />and Loretta Jacoe, and Percy and Carolyn Conarroe. The current owner purchased the <br />property in 1999. <br />LANDMARK APPROVAL: <br />Louisville City Council approved the landmark application for 1131 Jefferson Avenue, by <br />a 7-0 vote, on September 21, 2010. <br />PREVIOUS GRANTS: <br />Incentive Grant - $1,000 (signing bonus) <br />Incentive Grant - $5,000 (routine maintenance, painting) <br />Restoration Grant - $2,719 (Site Work) <br />Restoration Grant - $9,084 (Carport restructure, Sump Pump) <br />Historic Structure Assessment - $2,200 (Technical Assistance Memo and Drawings) <br />REQUEST: <br />The applicant, Janice Hoffman, is requesting approval of a Preservation and <br />Restoration Grant to allow for the existing roof to be restructured because it is <br />undersized. The HPC/Council approved historic structure assessment (HSA) <br />determined the existing roofing structure is substandard and must be retrofitted. <br />Because the structure is a landmark, the HSA recommends retaining as many of the <br />existing materials as possible. The roofing shingles, however, are not historic and may <br />be removed. <br />The following excerpt from the Technical Assistance memo, dated <br /> prepared by JVA <br />April 6, 2011, states: <br />“Our analysis indicates that the existing roof framing over the main portion of the house is <br />severely overstressed. The rafters span approximately 17.5 feet from the eave to the <br />ridge, far exceeding their capability. Supporting only the ceiling, the ceiling joists are <br />capable of spanning from the exterior bearing walls to the interior bearing wall. But, the <br />joists are overstressed when loaded by the intermediate line of support. Similarly over the <br />Porch, the rafters have calculated overstresses exceeding Code allowed limits. <br />“Recommendations: <br />“Over the main portion of the house, the roof framing should be strengthened. The <br />existing framing has significant calculated overstresses, localized areas of failure, and <br />localized areas of excessive deflections. As such, the framing requires repair in order to <br />be in compliance with the Code. <br />“The design of such repairs is beyond the scope of this Memo. However, the following <br />recommendations should be considered when determining the next steps: <br />1. Remove the intermediate lines of support in the attic in order to unload the ceiling <br />joists and eliminate any further cracking in the ceiling finishes. <br />2. Support the rafter ends at the ridge. This would most economically be <br />accomplished by constructing a wood stud cripple wall in the attic from the ridge <br />2 <br /> <br />