My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2000 02 15
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2000 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2000 02 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:45 PM
Creation date
1/30/2004 10:36:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
2/15/2000
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2000 02 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
He felt that the "shall" gives the Ordinance more structure and support. He stated he was <br />very pleased with the outcome of the process. <br /> <br />Sisk stated his concern over potential problems with some of the "shall" and "intends to" <br />language. He gave the examples 4.03.010, page 7, Section C Open Space Visitor- Land, <br />Paragraph 3, "Visitation levels to this classification of land shall be moderate to <br />moderately high". He agreed that the "shall" language was appropriate. However, on <br />page 6, Paragraph A. Open Space -Preserve, "Where Open Space-Preserve land is <br />adjacent to other Open Space or other City-owned land, it is the "intention" that ...."In <br />that instance, Sisk felt the "intention" language is more appropriate. <br /> <br />Brown stated that the particular paragraph was meant to include "intention." It was to <br />address a situation between two different classifications of open space land. The intent is <br />such that when possible, the land of lesser preservation standard would be managed so as <br />not to injure or interfere with the higher level of preservation. He agreed that that this <br />particular "intention" language remain as "intention." <br /> <br />Sisk stated that if all the "intentions" were changed to "shall" it would not read correctly. <br /> <br />Sam Light, City Attorney, reviewed the "shall .... intend" language in Chapter 4.03 - <br />Management of Open Space Lands. <br /> <br />1 .) In Section 4.030.010, Introductory Paragraph, Page 6, second sentence, "It is <br />"intended" that the differing classification of Open Space will require different <br />management policies," will remain as "intended." <br /> <br />2.) In the same sentence, "with the intended uses of the land" will remain as "intended." <br /> <br />3.) In the same paragraph, the last sentence "The City of Louisville "intends" to manage <br />Opens Space according to the following classifications" will be changed to "shall". <br /> <br />4.) In paragraph A. 1, Open Space-Preserve, "Where Open Space-Preserve land is <br />adjacent to other Open Space or other City-owned land, it is the intention that when <br />possible the adjacent land shall include a sufficient buffer area to permit the successful <br />management of the Open Space-Preserve land," will remain the same. <br /> <br />5.) In the same sentence "the adjacent land shall include a sufficient buffer," will remain <br />"shall." <br /> <br />6.) In Paragraph A. 2., the first sentence "This land shall be managed," will remain <br />"shall." <br /> <br />7.) In the second sentence, "It is the intention that management of City-owned lands," <br />will be changed to "shall," by striking the phrase "it is the intention that" at the beginning <br />of the sentence. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.